Radicals you Want, Radicals you Got

Radicals Run Obamaland

by Robert M. Engstrom

04/28/2009

Check it out--27 Identified!

Where are all those "moderates"?

Letter to Obama from Every real American

Subject: : Letter to our President

April 17, 2009

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Mr. Obama:

I have had it with you and your administration, sir. Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.

You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America. You are responsible to the citizens of the United States. You are not responsible to the peoples of any other country on earth.

I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the peoples of Europe? Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?

Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country? Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States? This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?

Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia. You don’t show Great Britain, our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia. How dare you, sir! How dare you!

You can’t find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don’t want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque inTurkey. You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What’s the matter with you?

I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you.

You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them? Anything? I seriously doubt it.

What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members – on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven’t said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn’t!
Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that's $45 million more than the AIG bonuses. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million – not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven’t you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now.
I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you. I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities. I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms destroying my beautiful country.

Sincerely,

Every real American

Thanks to writer for submitting this letter.

That Just About Sums It Up

100 Days, 100 Mistakes...

Despicable State (U.S.) of Affairs

What were 70 million voters thinking?

As my readers know, I'm not grammatically correct and don't have a gift for writing. But I've tried to provide links to articles of content and substance at VoterInfomation and ObamaTimes for busy people to obtain facts without spending their life searching for the real truth in this day of The PC Media Sound Bite.

This Article in The Washington Times By Wesley Pruden (Contact) Tuesday, April 21, 2009 is one that summarizes the message of many of my previous postings, and it should alert you to what a major problem we have created.

This wouldn't be one of Dr. Freud's difficult cases. He was born to a mother obsessed with the pursuit of inappropriate men who would treat her badly, abandoned by his father from Kenya, uprooted again from life with a stepfather in Indonesia and ultimately raised by a grandmother he would later publicly scold for her presumed racial bigotry. Why wouldn't he feverishly pursue sanction and esteem, however mindless much of it would be, wherever he could find it?

Only a man with a screwed-up psyche, the likes of which we've probably never had in the White House before, would fly off to foreign shores to campaign against his predecessor and to offer abject apologies to anyone listening for the harm he imagines his country did to others, while carefully excluding himself from any of the criticism.

That about sums it up, but I recommend you read the whole Article and the Other Articles, Mr. Pruden has written. "This Kid is Good"

Is It Treason?

Definition of Treason from Wikipedia:

Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.

Is It Treason when a candidate runs for President of the United States and refuses to prove his eligibility for the position of the US President.?

Is It Treason that a candidate for President submits documents (Legal Actions) that:

• presents a Selective Service certificate (that) was forged and backdated.
• swears under oath that he did not have and never had any other prior names. (When there is proof he did.)
  

Is It Treason to be Commander in Chief when you are not Constitutionally qualified?

In light of the above, Is It Treason for the Illegal Officer to issue the following Executive Orders:

• closure of the Guantanamo detention center no later than one year from the date of the Order.
• to halt military commission proceedings pending the results of the review.
• revokes Executive Order 13440 that interpreted Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.
• orders the CIA to close all existing detention facilities and prohibits it from operating detention facilities in the future.

Is It Treason to define your Political Rivals as Terrorists?

Is It Treason to Prosecute previous Administration for Policy Decisions?

Is It Treason to implement the following Spending Plan:

• To finance (1) his 10-year, $150 billion program to "establish a green energy sector," (2) his 10-year, $60 billion "National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank," (3) his nearly universal health care plan (whose annual price tag he low-balls at $50 to $65 billion) and (4) a host of refundable tax credits ranging from $4,000 per year for college students to a tripling of the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers, (Illegal Officer) plans to (1) end the war in Iraq, (2) permit the Bush tax cuts to expire for households earning more than $250,000 and (3) "change our tax code," which "has been rigged by lobbyists with page after page of loopholes that benefit big corporations and the wealthiest few."

Is It Treason to Nationalize American Banks?

Is It Treason to Nationalize American Industry?

Is It Treason to implement harmful Energy Policies that will damage America?

Is It Treason if the Offender is a non Citizen? dual Citizen? Legal Citizen?

Is It Treason if Offender overrides State Rights?

Is It Treason if Offender undermines American security?

Is It Treason if Offender is able to set up Socialist Government before being exposed?

Is It Treason to overthrow a Socialist Government if the above occurs?

So--Bush didn't Do It!

and Neither did the Republicans, except John McCain, The Media Candidate!

The Hill
Obama’s leap to socialism

By Dick Morris

Posted: 04/21/09 05:21 PM [ET]

When the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) intervention was first outlined by the Bush administration, it did not call for any transfer of stock, of any sort, to the government. The Democrats demanded, as a price for their support, that the taxpayers “get something back” for the money they were lending to the banks. House Republicans, wise to what was going on, rejected the administration’s proposal and sought, instead, to provide insurance to banks, rather than outright cash. Their plan would, of course, not involve any transfer of stock. But Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) undercut his own party’s conservatives and went along with the Democratic plan, ensuring its passage.

But to avoid the issue of a potential for government control of the banks, everybody agreed that the stock the feds would take back in return for their money would be preferred stock, not common stock. “Preferred” means that these stockholders get the first crack at dividends, but only common stockholders can actually vote on company management or policy. Now, by changing this fundamental element of the TARP plan, Obama will give Washington a voting majority among the common stockholders of these banks and other financial institutions. The almost 500 companies receiving TARP money will be, in effect, run by Washington.

And whoever controls the banks controls the credit and, therefore, the economy. That’s called socialism.

You can blame Bush for his good intentions, but failed policy, for trying to protect America. But You can give credit to the Democrats/Obama for converting it to Socialism.

Coming Obama Constitutional Crisis?

A more important Extremism missed by DHS and their accomplices, The Liberal Media, is The Obama Birth Certificate Issue.

DHS failed to include those Extremist that are obstructing the people from obtaining proof Obama was born in the U.S. I'm not sure why, because Obama actively obstructs access to the data that would prove he was. It is entirely possible that he truly is an Illegal President and will create a Constitution Crisis when it is verified. USJF

He has prevented court access to his actual birth certificate, he has prevented court access to almost all of his education records, and he has threatened sanctions (AIM) on those trying to obtain the facts.

Current Court Filing: WND

Taking her case to Supreme Court

Originally, she (Taitz) filed with Justice Anthony Kennedy, and he denied it. She resubmitted it to Chief Justice John Roberts, and he distributed it for conference.

"On the Jan. 20, the case was on the docket, and everybody could see it," Taitz said. "Then, right after the inauguration, on Jan. 21, it disappeared. It was as if somebody was trying to please Obama by erasing the docket."

Taitz has stepped up her fight, approaching Justice Antonin Scalia during his appearance in Los Angeles and hand-delivering documents to Chief Justice John Roberts at his appearance at the University of Idaho. She also presented Roberts with the WND petition, consisting of 3,300 pages of names – more than 325,000 at the time – of people demanding the Supreme Court hear the Obama eligibility case.

Taitz updates her Defend Our Freedoms blog with information about her cases. Her latest challenge to Obama's eligibility is a Quo Warranto case submitted to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, a legal standard that essentially allows citizens to demand on what grounds someone in authority exercises power.

She has 10 state representatives and about 130 members of the U.S. military signed on as plaintiffs in the action.

Have you seen this on CNN, or any other Main Stream Media?

Supporting Links: USJF AIM