Taitz v Astrue Opposition to motion for summary judgment | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

Taitz v Astrue Opposition to motion for summary judgment | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants motion for summary judgment needs to be denied based on the genuine issue of material fact. Opposition will be based on the memorandum of points and authorities attached herein and oral argument, if the court deems oral argument necessary.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. AGENCY PROFFERED A FRAUDULENT STATEMENT, CLAIMING THAT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 042-68-4425 BELONGS TO A LIVE PERSON, WHILE IT’S OWN RECORDS SHOW, THAT THIS NUMBER WAS NEVER ASSIGNED………………………………………………………………p5
2. DEFENDANT PROVIDED THE PLAINTIFF A FORGED SS-5 FOR ANN DUNHAM, OBAMA’S MOTHER, WHICH SHOWS A PATTERN OF EITHER COVER UP OF FORGERY OR EXTREME RECKLESSNESS IN ALLOWING FORGED OR FRAUDULENT RECORDS TO BE FILED AS GENUINE RECORDS…………………………………………………………………….p6
3. SSA DOES NOT SPECIFY THAT THE SS-5 FOR 042-68-4425 IS A VALID DOCUMENT, THAT IT IS NOT A FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED OR FORGED DOCUMENT………………………………………………………………….p7
4. SSA DID NOT PROVIDE ANY ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, PROVING THAT SS-5 IN QUESTION EVEN EXISTS AND THAT IT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO A CURRENT “HOLDER” OF THE NUMBER……… p10
5. Cover up by SSA and Selective service point to fraud………………. p13
6. 4. 5USC§552(B)(6) RELATES TO FULL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS, IT DOES NOT RELATE TO THE REDACTED NUMBERS AND REDACTED APPLICATIONS……………………………………………p14
7. REDACTED SS-5 DOES NOT INVADE PRIVACY…………………………..p14
8. THE RIGHT OF 311 MILLION AMERICAN CITIZENS TO HAVE A PRESIDENT, WHO IS NOT A FRAUD AND WHO IS NOT USURPING THE US PRESIDENCY BY VIRTUE OF FRAUD SUPERCEDES THE RIGHT OF BARACK OBAMA TO FRAUDULENTLY USE THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, WHICH WAS NEVER ASSIGNED TO HIM….p15

Will Courts cover for Obama again?