Holder, by contrast, did not assert a legal privilege. He instead made up a frivolous rationale for obstructing Congress’s investigation and relied on it for months — even as he and his subordinates have repeatedly been forced to acknowledge that representations they made to the committee were false. It is one thing to posit a real legal claim that happens to be inapposite under the circumstances. It is quite another for the chief federal law-enforcement official in the country, whose post is created by and reliant on Congress, to stymie Congress based on a fabrication that he passed off as a legal theory.Andrew McCarthy's analysis you can take to the court, if we still have any legitimate courts left, under this Holder Injustice Department.
Sunday, June 24, 2012
The Case for Removing Holder - By Andrew C. McCarthy - The Corner - National Review Online
The Case for Removing Holder - By Andrew C. McCarthy - The Corner - National Review Online
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment