The case "places squarely before the high court the question of whether the constitutional Rule of Law will be preserved in this nation, as opposed to egregious bias on the part of a judge who relied upon such extra-judicial factors as that 'The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the president,…'
"The judge then went on to sarcastically declare: '...but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court.' Imagine that, a citizen wanting a serious constitutional issue resolved by a court! John Marshall, roll over in your grave. We believe this sentiment is called in the language of the Supreme Court in numerous cases a denial of 'access to the courts,' or of 'access to justice,' and is rooted in the First and Seventh Amendments as well as a number of other constitutional provisions," the website explains.
Neither is Hollister a novice on the issue of eligibility, it explains.
"It is a matter of record that Colonel Hollister, while on active duty in the Air Force, in a career from which he honorably retired, inquired into the legitimacy of President Clinton's orders because President Clinton participated, while at Oxford, in communist protest marches in Eastern Europe against the Vietnam War at a time when we were at war with communism in Vietnam, something that would seem to violate the Fourteenth Amendment," the site explains.
The questions suggested by the petition are weighty:
- "Did the district court examine the complaint, as required by the decisions of this and every other federal court, to see if it alleged facts to support its claims?"
- "By refusing to consider the issue of defendant Obama not being a 'natural born citizen' as set out in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution, did the district court violate its obligations to consider the issues raised by the complaint?"
- "In … relying on extrajudicial criteria such as an assertion that 'the issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency' combined with an attack on petitioner … did the district court not engage in such obvious political bias and upon extrajudicial factors as to render its opinion void?"
- "Did the … bias engaged in lead to a decision which ignored the law as set out above and as a result place the respondent-defendant Obama above that law and the rule of law in this country generally and threaten the constitutional basis and very existence of our rule of law?"
- "Did the courts below not completely ignore the decisions of this court and the clear language of Rule 15 of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning amendments so as to compound its biased elevation of the defendant Obama above the rule of constitutional law?"
While the district judge dismissed the case because it had been "twittered," the appeals court simply adopted his reasoning, but wouldn't even allow its opinion affirming the decision to be published, the petition explains.
Read more: New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=245753#ixzz19iIqpdzJ
Friday, December 31, 2010
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Monday, December 27, 2010
Officer won't sign order for troop indoctrination
Obama's Destruction of the Military is under way.The soldier sent the following letter to his commanding officer:
Subject: Request for Relief from Command due to Personal Moral Conflict with New Homosexual Policy
1. I respectfully request to be relieved of Command of XXX Squadron, XXX Cavalry prior to new policy implementation subsequent to the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." My personal religious beliefs and moral convictions do not permit me to treat homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle, compatible with military service, any more than adultery, illicit drug use, or criminal activity. I believe this lifestyle runs counter to good order and discipline in military units, and I refuse to sacrifice my belief system, protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, in order to fall in line with the command policy that will logically follow. This new policy will undoubtedly include mandatory sensitivity training as well as same-sex partner inclusion in Family Readiness Group activities and integration into the full spectrum of other military benefits, as well as a whole new category of discrimination standards and investigative procedures. I will not, as a commander, put my signature on a training schedule or other document recognizing or legitimizing any of these things that contradict my personal beliefs.
2. I would like to remain in the XXX Army National Guard until I am eligible for retirement (at 20 years and 0 days), which would be in the late summer of 2012, but on grounds of my religious beliefs, I will not attend sensitivity or behavior modification training consequential to this policy change, even if it means disciplinary action. I regret that I cannot continue to serve in the military further, but feel that my efforts would be insincere because my heart will no longer be in it.""I will not be the person who forces this training on my soldiers," the officer, whose identity was being protected, told WND. He plans to go on the record as soon as he discusses his request with his chain of command.
The officer said he's aware of other officers who intend to resign their commissions.
Something really queer going on here.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Vice Admiral: Obama was outmaneuvered by Russians on START | U.S. Naval Institute
“The Obama administration is continuing a dated policy in which we cannot even unilaterally reduce our own inventory of weapons and delivery systems without being on parity with the Russians,” Miller told the U.S. Naval Institute in Annapolis, Md. “We could give up plenty of deployed delivery systems and not adversely affect our national security one bit, but New START prohibits such action - so we are now stuck with some outmoded and useless elements in our nuke force.”Du, who would have ever guessed it?
Too bad it was security instead of politics. Resident Obama's Adm shows concern when it's politics.
Internet Access Is Not a Civil Right - Michelle Malkin - National Review Online
The “net neutrality” mob — funded by billionaire George Soros and other left-wing think tanks and nonprofits — has openly advertised its radical, speech-squelching agenda in its crusade for “media justice.” Social justice is the redistribution of wealth and economic “rights.” Media justice is the redistribution of free speech and other First Amendment rights.If you don't see this for what it is, then your willing to hand over another freedom to Government.
The meetings of the universal-broadband set are littered with Marxist-tinged rants about “disenfranchisement” and “empowerment.” They’ve targeted conservative opponents on talk radio, cable TV, and the Internet as purveyors of “hate” who need to be managed or censored. Democratic FCC panelists have dutifully echoed their concerns about concentration of corporate media power.
As the Ford Foundation–funded Media Justice Fund, which lobbied for universal broadband, put it: This is a movement “grounded in the belief that social and economic justice will not be realized without the equitable redistribution and control of media and communication technologies.”
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Specter RINO's listed in BOLD!
YEAs ---71 Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Brown (R-MA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Coons (D-DE)
Corker (R-TN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lugar (R-IN)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (D-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
Remember them when you evaluate who you can trust! Five of them made the difference.
Morning Bell: It’s Time to Stop the FCC Internet Czars | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.
Meet FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, a political appointee and Harvard Law classmate of President Barack Obama. Genachowski is leading the FCC’s charge for new powers over the Internet so it can enact a policy known as “net neutrality,” which would allow the commission to regulate how Internet providers like Comcast or Verizon offer their services. If you’re someone who is suspicious of big corporations, that sounds like a great idea. If you’re someone who is fearful of big government, take heed. In reality, the policy will limit consumer choice while granting the federal government unprecedented power over the Internet. As Heritage’s James Gattuso describes:
The net result [of net neutrality]— a slower and more congested Internet, and more frustration for users. Even worse, investment in expanding the Internet will be chilled, as FCC control of network management makes investment less inviting. The amounts at stake aren’t trivial, with tens of billions invested each year in Internet expansion.
The FCC's Threat to Internet Freedom
Don't forget it also sets up a revenue mechanism of licensing, fines for courts, and a new Government Bureaucracy.Obama 'snookered' by Russia in new arms treaty
Resident Obama and the Libs weren't snookered, they are intentionally destroying America one piece at a time."The Russians have snookered the Obama administration," Kwapisz told WND. "They got virtually everything they wanted but gave up nothing of importance to us on verification, missile defenses and their advantage in tactical nuclear weapons."
"I believe we are impairing our ability to mount a strategic defense," said one working group member, Ambassador Henry Cooper, former director of the Strategic Defense Initiative and the chief U.S. strategic weapons negotiator with the Soviet Union during the Reagan administration.
"The Russians have said we cannot make any qualitative or quantitative improvements on the strategic defenses we already have," Cooper added, pointing out that the U.S. needs to deploy new defenses against newly developing threats from countries other than Russia.
Another good day for Obama is another bad day for America.
Don't Ask Don Tell? Destruction of Military Act!
Unemployment? America Dependence Act!
Debt? Bankrupt America Act!
Corruption? Regime Control Act!
Obama Background Verification? America Deception Act!
FCC takeover of Internet? Net Neutrality Act!
Drilling bans? Energy Reduction Act!
That's just for reminders, and hardly even touches on the other intentional destruction Acts already implemented.
Ex-Googler leaving White House | POLITICO 44
McLaughlin was Google’s head of global public policy before assuming the role of Deputy Chief Technology Officer in the White House, working on a number of high-level Internet issues, such as net neutrality, cybersecurity, online privacy and the nation’s broadband strategy. Before joining the White House, he worked on Obama’s transition team.Now it's time for him to capitalize on the legislation he helped craft. Should be able to get funding from both Resident Obama and Google now that he's written his own law.
Obama Business as usual, corruption taken to the next level.
Do you really think Rahm isn't going to run Chicago? Wishful thinking.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
John Fund: The Net Neutrality Coup - WSJ.com
It gets better as the take over continues.There's little evidence the public is demanding these rules, which purport to stop the non-problem of phone and cable companies blocking access to websites and interfering with Internet traffic. Over 300 House and Senate members have signed a letter opposing FCC Internet regulation, and there will undoubtedly be even less support in the next Congress.
Yet President Obama, long an ardent backer of net neutrality, is ignoring both Congress and adverse court rulings, especially by a federal appeals court in April that the agency doesn't have the power to enforce net neutrality. He is seeking to impose his will on the Internet through the executive branch. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, a former law school friend of Mr. Obama, has worked closely with the White House on the issue. Official visitor logs show he's had at least 11 personal meetings with the president.
What Constitution? No longer relevant to Resident Obama and his Regime.
You better learn "Hail Obama" courtesty of Julius Seizure.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Friday, December 17, 2010
Thursday, December 16, 2010
seMissourian.com: Column: Mike Jensen: Redistribution on steroids
In the midst of a colossal global concern for the economic stability of our great nation, Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri's 5th Congressional District representative, has one small earmark on his wish list that deserves some attention.
Cleaver has listed a new earmark -- one of several -- and he promises to "fight for every one." But this is a whopping $48 billion package that must go down as the grandaddy of all earmarks.
Proposed by a gentleman named Lamar Mickens, president of the not-for-profit Quality Day Campus, the $48 billion earmark would funnel money into the inner cities to give money to the poor and thereby produce a much larger consumer class to buy the goods and services produced in this country.
Just call this redistribution on steroids.
Lakin: 'I chose the wrong path'
It ain't over until Resident Obama is exposed for what he is, or isn't.Deprived by trial judge Col. Denise Lind of any opportunity to defend himself by introducing evidence or expert testimony, Lakin was reduced to pleading guilty on three charges of disobeying orders and mounting only a narrow, technical defense on the "missing movement" charge. Lakin's attorney, Neal Puckett, tried in vain to persuade the court-martial panel to convict Lakin of a lesser charge.
"His attorney was reduced to a circus clown because [Lind] wouldn't allow a meaningful defense," said California attorney Orly Taitz, who has brought repeated cases challenging Obama's eligibility before U. S. courts. "It's a joke, just a farce."
"The issue is very simple," said New Jersey attorney William Baer. "What is the definition of "natural-born citizen" and does Obama meet it? Nobody will let the question be asked."
"The military wouldn't let him have discovery, so he said 'go ahead and put me in prison,' said retired Navy Commander Charles F. Kerchner of Emmaus, Penn., the plaintiff in a Taitz case that recently went before the U.S. Supreme Court. "He's a political prisoner."
Kerchner and retired Army Capt. Pamela Barnett of Sacramento, another Taitz plaintiff, both said they attended the court martial to support Lakin. Kerchner and Barnett pointed out that they, like Lakin, have been denied justice by U.S. courts that refused to hear the merits of their cases against Obama.
"They took away every Constitutional right Lakin has, said Barnett. "The U.S. Supreme Court and the House of Representatives should address this stripping of an officer's civil rights. A terrorist has more rights than Terry Lakin."
Place your bets.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
American Thinker: Crucible of a Hero
I stated at the outset is that Lakin's stature is assured despite the verdict. Here's why. The charges are (i) that he missed his deployment flight; and (ii) conduct unbecoming an officer. He has, in the early stages of his trial, been denied discovery, and the presentation of witnesses, evidence, or argument in defense of his position. That position necessarily goes to the heart of whether Obama should hold the White House keys. Conviction on the charges seems inescapable. The military court is not likely to risk uncovering an inconvenient truth about the acting President, if there be one. Were Lakin to be exonerated -- which seems all but impossible -- then the tribunal would be staring in the face the propriety of all things Obama, a task far too sensitive for it. And the question of his provenance would fairly beg itself into being before Court could adjourn. And on the other hand, if Lakin is convicted, well, society will be no closer to probing the mystery of the guarded origins and persona of the Commander-in-Thief. Which will make doubly urgent Lakin's reach for the grail of truth, and for others to take up his cause.Who do you trust, Resident Soetoro/Obama or LTC Lakin?
Who would you believe?
At least you have a choice from both ends of the spectrum!
Guess which has one Social Security No.
Guess which is registered with Selective Service?
Guess which has a Real Birth Certificate?
Guess who really deserves to be behind bars?
Lakin guilty on 3 counts
The real story is that Military Justice has be co-oped as have many Federal Courts, and 4 out of 5 "Justices" of the Supreme Court.Orly Taitz, one of the attorneys spearheading the legal efforts to compel Obama to produce his birth and citizenship documents, criticized the strategy of conceding guilt on three charges.
"Even if you beat the fourth charge, what have you gained?" Taitz argued. "He's still facing 18 months in prison, loss of retirement benefits and dismissal from the service."
Taitz acknowledged that Puckett's hands are tied by Lind's earlier rulings effectively forbidding what might be the most effective line of defense, the argument that any order originating with Obama might in fact be illegal as long as Obama's eligibility remains unproven.
"He's reduced to arguing a technicality," Taitz told WND. "The whole trial is a sham, a farce. They're not allowed to discuss the only real issue here, Obama's eligibility."
Retired Navy Lt. Commander Charles Kerchner, the plaintiff in an eligibility suit recently rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, doubts that justice will be done in Lakin's court martial.
"They have not allowed him discovery and exculpatory evidence, which the Constitution affords all of us," said Kerchner. "I don't know what legal rabbit [the defense is] going to pull out of a hat but they're obviously planning something."
Lakin's brother, Dr. Greg Lakin, was more upbeat about Puckett's defense strategy.
"[Puckett] wants to focus on the big issue here," Greg Lakin told WND. According to Lakin, Puckett chose to concede the smaller matters in order to direct the court martial panel's attention on the "missing movement" charge, which is most closely linked to Obama's personal authority because it ties directly to the order to deploy to Iraq as part of Obama's surge strategy.
"The president has taken full credit for the Afghanistan deployment, he signed the order," said Greg Lakin. "Terry will have a chance to say his piece during the sentencing portion of the trial."
What Constitution?
Monday, December 13, 2010
American Thinker Blog: A government jobs program, San Francisco style
$59,000 a year for a Junior anal yst.How many bureaucrats does it take to create a job? Well, if the "hire local" ordinance coming before the San Francisco Board of Supervisors this week is any indication - quite a few. And they don't come cheap.Under the proposed ordinance coming up for a final vote Tuesday, building contractors doing business with the city would have to hire as many as half their workers from within the city. Half the new hires will also have to come from the ranks of the "disadvantaged." The goal is to see that 355 locals are trained for work through the hire-local program. But, of course, any new program requires a bureaucracy to administer it. In the case of the local-hire program, that means the city bringing in a new:-- $59,000-a-year junior analyst.-- $80,000-a-year community development specialist.-- $87,878-a-year accountant.-- $88,660-a-year contract compliance officer.-- And a $116,246-a-year contract compliance officer II.Add in fringe benefits, paper, pencils and the like, and you're talking $1.3 million annually. But wait, there's more. To prove that the applicants are indeed San Francisco residents, the county clerk wants them to have an official city-issued ID - which, in turn, means hiring an additional two clerks at $50,000 and $65,546 a year, plus a $57,044-a-year legal process clerk. Add in fringe benefits, work stations and the like, and you're talking another $923,000.Total yearly administration cost: $2.2 million, or about $6,200 per job.Now that's job creation.
COUNTDOWN to Court-Martial (Fort Meade, MD, Dec 14-15)
This week, the American Patriot Foundation heard from a retired Navy SEAL, shocked by the stunning decision by a civilian court in which a terrorist suspect/detainee was convicted on only ONE count of 249 criminal charges: "Let me see if I understand this, Col. Lakin can get a more severe punishment that Ahmed Ghailani?"
Unlike Ghailani, LTC Lakin is being tried in a military court-- for defying military orders in order to seek the truth about whether Obama is legally, Constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief. LTC Lakin's sworn oath as a military officer requires him to uphold the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
No one in his chains of command or in his Congressional delegation could tell him-- after more than a year of seeking assurance that his orders were lawful-- if Obama met the requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution of a "natural born citizen" and was entitled to command the U.S. Armed Forces. LTC Lakin's military orders to deploy to Afghanistan under Obama's announced surge, included a requirement that he present copies of his birth certificate (to which he dutifully complied).
We continue to be amazed at an administration that balks at producing such a simple, elementary document-- one that every US citizen possesses and is asked to show many times during his or her lifetime.
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Saturday, December 11, 2010
McInerny: Congress will review Lakin case
"The judge in this particular case said I do not know enough about the Army to be able to understand the Army's position on the Uniform Code of Military Justice," said McInerney, who added he once commanded an army division in Alaska as part of a joint Army-Air Force command.
"I am intimately familiar with the Uniform Code of Military Justice," said McInerney. "But you get a judge ... who says that I as a three-star general who had general court martial authority do not know enough about the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Dr. Terry Lakin is not going to get a fair trial in this particular proceeding."
McInerney was asked by the defense to testify about when a soldier is trained to disobey orders he believes are illegal.
Prosecuting Assange Under the Espionage Act - By Andrew C. McCarthy - The Corner - National Review Online
(a) In this context as in that of alien enemy combatants, we should presume that constitutional protections do not extend to aliens located overseas, particularly those who are hostile to our government. The Constitution is intended to protect Americans from arbitrary or abusive acts by their government, not to protect aliens outside our borders, much less enemy aliens. And
(b) Assange is not a journalist. As Gabe points out, the First Amendment has never immunized journalists from liability for publishing national defense information shielded by the Espionage Act — the Pentagon Papers case merely held that there should not be a prior restraint against publication, not that there could not be a post-publication prosecution. Moreover, as Gabe further notes, prosecutors are leery of proceeding against journalists due to judicial interpretations of the espionage act that call for proof of “bad faith” on the part of the journalist. I think this hesitation is misplaced: at most, “bad faith” for these purposes means the prosecutor must show the journalist was aware that publication could harm the U.S. — it doesn’t matter if the journalist had what he subjectively saw as admirable motives. But such knotty journalistic intent issues are irrelevant when we are dealing with a non-journalist who acts with an unabashed goal of undermining the United States. (On Assange’s anti-American rationale, I highly recommend Gordon Crovitz’s insightful WSJ column from Monday, “Julian Assange, Information Anarchist.”)
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Approved Applications for Waiver of the Annual Limits Requirements of the PHS Act Section 2711 as of December 3, 2010
222 Applicants
Total Enrollees | 1,507,418 | 1,507,418 |
Obamacare for the rest of us.
WikiLeaks cables: Barack Obama is a bigger danger | John Bolton | Comment is free | The Guardian
All of this underscores the real problem. It is not WikiLeaks that ultimately imperils our national security, but the failing Obama administration, which ignores the nature and extent of threats we face, and which is too often unwilling to act to thwart them. While our economic difficulties have dominated the national debate for two years, national security will inevitably again come to the fore, as Americans see the full extent of the devastation left by Obama's policies. That shift cannot come too soon.Resident Obama and his Liberal cronies are hurting America more than WikiLeaks wildest dreams.
Having said that, WikiLeaks is making it more dangerous and difficult for the Patriots defending America and more difficult to free many peoples from the real threats throughout the World.
Friday, December 3, 2010
Lakin's attorney: Conviction 'certain'
Lakin had intended, through a court martial, to resolve the nationwide dispute about Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.
Knowing he was risking imprisonment and dismissal from the service, Lakin deliberately disobeyed his superiors in order to force Obama to produce his birth certificate and documents related to his citizenship status.
His plan was frustrated when Col. Lind declared that Lakin's orders were legitimate, without addressing the underlying eligibility issue, and ruled to limit the scope of the trial to the narrow question of whether Lakin had knowingly disobeyed orders.
"This leaves us with a client who stands accused of missing the movement of an airplane, two failures to obey orders to meet his brigate commander, failure to report to Ft. Campbell, and failure to report to his unit," said Puckett.
"LTC Lakin asked many people to answer his questions about his misgivings about the legitimacy of the president, even the White House. He had a question that a lot of Americans have, a question that hasn't been answered by the legislative branch or by the judicial branch. When he received his orders he had a conscience issue, whether he'd be obeying lawful orders," Puckett explained.
"LTC Lakin is a doctor, not a lawyer," said Puckett. "He thought if he were to ask that question of the military courts, after being rebuffed in all other avenues, he'd get his answer. What he has discovered is that the military justice system cannot produce the answers to those questions. He could not have known, he was given inadequate legal advice. The military justice system is set up to help commanding officers maintain good order and discipline. It can't make victims whole, it can only punish wrongdoers. He's very disappointed in the system."
"We have to proceed without the documents, evidence and witnesses that have been denied to the defense. LTC Lakin is left to speak for himself and defend himself. It's up to him whether he wants to testify in his own defense, said Puckett.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Judge slams state's anti-Shariah amendment
Another Activist court in action.Oklahoma's "Save Our State Amendment," which bans state courts from considering Islamic, or Shariah, law when deciding cases, hit a major roadblock today, when a federal judge granted a permanent injunction against the measure.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Kerchner v. Obama
Resident Obama saved by the Supreme Court--for now. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facebook | Serious Questions about the Obama Administration's Incompetence in the Wikileaks Fiasco
If only we had a President that was this competent.Most importantly, serious questions must also be asked of the U.S. intelligence system. How was it possible that a 22-year-old Private First Class could get unrestricted access to so much highly sensitive information? And how was it possible that he could copy and distribute these files without anyone noticing that security was compromised?
The White House has now issued orders to federal departments and agencies asking them to take immediate steps to ensure that no more leaks like this happen again. It’s of course important that we do all we can to prevent similar massive document leaks in the future. But why did the White House not publish these orders after the first leak back in July? What explains this strange lack of urgency on their part?
We are at war. American soldiers are in Afghanistan fighting to protect our freedoms. They are serious about keeping America safe. It would be great if they could count on their government being equally serious about that vital task.
- Sarah Palin
U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility | Western Journalism.com
The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a “natural-born citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.Resident Obama can run and hide, but he will be caught sooner or later.
Wonder if his two appointments are going to recuse themselves?
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Woman wears bikini to avoid TSA pat-down at LAX [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment
Well at last something useful from the new TSA pat-down procedures!
Ten Things You Need to Know About the DREAM Act | Floyd Reports
If Obama can't seize it, he will give it away. Amnesty policy of Obama Times!
U.S. Government Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and More | TorrentFreak
Who needs Congress or Laws when you have Obama Times?
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility
The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.
"This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."
If the Supreme Court decides to grant the "writ of certiorari," it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court's decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
COUNTDOWN to Court-Martial (Fort Meade, MD, Dec 14-15)
Download APF's New Blunders Report (click here):
A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama’s Birth and Constitutional EligibilityCourt Martial: December 14-15
Fort Meade Information
For general information about Fort George G. Meade, contact our public affairs office:
(301) 677-1361
Fort Meade Public Affairs
Bldg 4550 Parade Field Lane
Fort Meade, MD 20755
Monday, November 22, 2010
FDIC Unsured « Oppressed Monkey
The FDIC, as of December 31, 2010, will insure a maximum of $7.6 Trillion in domestic deposits, minimum of $5.4 Trillion. To insure these deposits, the FDIC has a Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). The glaring problem with the DIF is its current balance of $-15.2 Billion. Got that? The FDIC will insure $7.6 Trillion in deposits with negative $15.2 Billion.Beware, the destruction of America is intentional by the Obama, Pelosi, Reid Monkeys.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Saturday, November 20, 2010
The American Spectator : Who Owns Whom?
Bestselling investigative reporter Charles Gasparino's latest tome Bought and Paid For: The Unholy Alliance Between Barack Obama and Wall Street commences not with a scene from the much-ballyhooed first one hundred days of the new Administration, but at a hush-hush 2007 pow-wow at Johnny's Half Shell in Washington, D.C. between then-Senator Barack Obama and executives from Wall Street's top firms -- Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns -- which went so swimmingly the only warm fuzzy it lacked was the ghost of Humphrey Bogart intoning, "Barry, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship."
TAS: What compelled you to write Bought and Paid For?
Charles Gasparino: The notion of Big Government and Big Wall Street colluding to do bad things is something I've covered for a long time. I've always been interested in the conflicts between public policy and finance. What I've seen over the years is this seemingly bizarre anomaly of how Wall Street, which is allegedly the epicenter of capitalism, in reality thrived on something that is very anti-capitalist, which is Big Government. Crony capitalism. And these guys aren't doing it just to make money on fees selling government bonds to finance the deficit or government programs. The people at the top have political beliefs that are strongly aligned with progressivism.
TAS: Reading your book I was surprised to learn how kindred a spirit the big players of Big Finance saw in Barack Obama, particularly at first. They weren't supporting him simply as a pragmatic, strategic move. David Axelrod joked about Obama having a "man crush" on JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon and you write financial executives saw the future president as "a guy who could have easily worked at a big Wall Street law firm if he hadn't gone into community organizing first."
Gasparino: I think a lot of the country was projecting something onto Obama they wanted to see but maybe wasn't there. Here was one of the most far left politicians I have ever seen -- based on his record, based on his associations, everything. People forget Reverend Wright, aside from his racially charged language, taught liberation theology, which basically says the Bible is infused with Marxism. That's his spiritual mentor. And all these Wall Street guys were lining up to support him.
Soros group maps out Obama strategy for next 2 years
Read itemized list by clicking Title."Progressives won in the 2010 mid-term elections," wrote Karen Dolan, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, or IPS, and director of the Cities for Progress and Cities for Peace projects based at the radical organization.
"The Congressional Progressive Caucus, the largest caucus in the House Democratic Caucus at over 80 members, emerged virtually unscathed, losing only three members," she wrote, in the piece published on the IPS website.
Dolan declared that "our work is now finally beginning."
"The veil of a happy Democratic governing majority is finally lifted. We didn't have it then; We don't have it now. But what we do have now is a more solidly progressive bunch of Dems in Congress and a president presumably less encumbered by the false illusion that playing nice will get him a date with the other team."
She went on to recommend that progressives "throw our support unabashedly behind the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and let's push Obama to finally do the right thing through as many Executive Orders as we can present to him."
Friday, November 12, 2010
Soros gives major boost to Jewish Fund for Justice | JTA - Jewish & Israel News
Interview on MSNBC Nov. 12, 2010 to attack Beck.NEW YORK, Dec.2 (JTA) — Financier and philanthropist George Soros is boosting the bank balance of the Jewish Fund for Justice by $1.3 million — his second-ever gift to a Jewish organization. Soros, a Hungarian-born Jew who earned his fortune managing hedge funds, which are high-risk, high-yield investments, has distributed millions around the globe to support everything from pro-democracy work in former communist countries to groups lobbying for the decriminalization of marijuana. Only recently has he given any money to a Jewish organization. His Open Society Institute’s Emma Lazarus Fund gave $1.3 million to the Council of Jewish Federations in August to fund naturalization programs for immigrants, primarily Jews from the former Soviet Union. The gift to the Jewish Fund for Justice is by far the largest that the anti-poverty and community development grant-making group has ever received, said Marlene Provizer, the group’s executive director. Provizer called Soros’ interest in the group “a natural fit” because of commitments both have to assisting refugees and immigrants, investing in youth and building community. The group raises money in the Jewish community and distributes it to community organizations across the United States. The fund was founded in 1984 and began making grants the following year. It has awarded $4.3 million in grants to over 400 community- based groups since then. Past grantees include The Interfaith Coalition for Immigrants’ Rights in San Francisco; the Jewish Community Housing Development Corporation in Washington, D.C., and the Omaha Together One Community, a campaign to increase services to local youth. Last year it distributed just over $600,000, an amount it will be able to increase by more than half this year as a result of Soros’ grant. The bulk of the Soros gift — $1 million — is a challenge grant to be allocated over three years. The fund has already raised about $300,000 of the matching funds it needs, it said in a statement. Part of the money from Soros, $300,000, will be used by the fund for institutional development, to help it broaden its base of support, Provizer said.
Soros is everywhere in The Lame Media. Surprise Surprise
Deficit commission relies on outside staffing | Muckety - See the news
Some of the funders/experts on the commission:
Soros/Open Society Institute
Soros/Economic Policy Institute
Pete Peterson Foundation
Andrew Stern, Robert Reich
Soros: Republic Enemy #1
Glenn Beck wasn't the first to discover the evil of George Soros, just the one with the biggest audience not controlled by Soros.
ORGANIZATIONS FUNDED DIRECTLY BY GEORGE SOROS AND HIS OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE
The Two Lists are too long to post here, but check it out if you have enough bandwidth.
Carol Browner
Ms. Browner currently serves as chair of the National Audubon Society, one of the country's oldest environmental organizations. She is on the Board of the Directors of the Center for American Progress, the Alliance for Climate Protection, and the National Brownfields Association.Just another Soros puppet in the Soros U.S. Government.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Officer's brother: 'Obama could have made this all go away'
WND reported a new trial date has been announced by the military for Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, the career Army doctor who decided to refuse an assignment to Afghanistan because of his concern that the orders he was issued in a chain of command headed by Barack Obama were not legal.
According to attorney Neal Puckett, who has represented Lakin since a military judge ordered Lakin could not have access to any information about President Obama's eligibility, the trial is scheduled to begin Dec. 14 and run for three days....
Lakin's strategy in earlier court appearances was to seek verification of the legality of his orders under Obama. But the military's judge has ruled he cannot access Obama's records nor can he question those who have custody of Obama's records. She even ruled he could not explain that he believes the orders are illegal.
It is possible that Lakin's case ultimately will end up before the Supreme Court, which may have difficulty ruling that he has no "standing" in the dispute. Virtually every other judge to date has concluded plaintiffs challenging Obama's eligibility lacked standing. But Lakin's case might be different because of the threat of jail time.
The American Patriot Foundation, which has been running the Safeguard our Constitution website and working in support of Lakin, has confirmed the public can use the channel to support Lakin.
There have been dozens of lawsuits and challenges over the fact that Obama's eligibility never has been documented. The "Certification of Live Birth" his campaign posted online is a document that Hawaii has made available to those not born in the state.
Lakin has been charged by the Army with missing a movement, disobeying a lawful order and dereliction of duty....
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Letter: Obama-Pelosi push 'fascist economic model' » TCPalm.com
Where has Nancy Pelosi been? As a figurehead and leader in government, a representative of women at large, why did she not take a stand to defend not only Hillary Clinton, but the advancement of women in all of our society?
When she was asked by the media about the demeaning assaults against Hillary Clinton, her reply was that she was too busy being the speaker of the House. That is a lot of bull. Ms. Pelosi would have the American people think that her job is so demanding. Do not be fooled. She is in bed with the enemy.
Enter into the camp of Speaker Pelosi: George Soros, Felix Rohatyn and Joseph Onek. Now connect the dots.
In 2007, Pelosi hired Onek as her chief counsel. Onek is also the chief adviser for the Open Society Institute, funded by the octopus Soros, whose tentacles extend all over Eastern Europe.
Rohatyn is one of Soros’ tentacles and serves as a major financial backer of Pelosi and is also another of her top economic advisers. He is also head of the Rohatyn-Rudman National Investment Corporation, a Soros holding.
Now “The Obama Connection.”
Obama has called for the formation of a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank. This is a derivative of the Rohatyn Investment Bank. Essentially, Obama has become a well-packaged surrogate for investment models controlled by Soros and those who subscribe to his world monetary monopoly.
The NIRB is nothing more than a fascist economic model, and un-
American in every recognizable sense. Soros’ aim, with Pelosi’s help, is to control the presidency.
It is only a matter of time before there is an African-American president. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark was reached.
"I am a Muslim," Obama Tells Egyptian Foreign Minister Gheit Islamic Coup on the White House - Atlas Shrugs
This was a statement by Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit on Nile-TV. It was made on the «Round table show».
This is the statement recorded:
Adul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, where the US President told him that He was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the step son of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda.
Adul Gheit claimed Obama told the Arabs to show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic issues, like the Health care reform, he would show the Muslim World how to deal with Israel.
Source: Israeli magazine, Israel today.
This is akin to an SS officer getting elected president during WW II. Every country in the free world must be cognizant of such a catastrophic sea change in the leadership of the free world (as witnessed by events over the past year). This changes everything. He took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, and yet he has gone around the world promoting Islam, the sharia (Islamic law).
The alleged exchange between Obama and Gheit would almost certainly have happened in early January 2010, when Gheit was in Washington, D.C. regarding "Mideast peace talks."
On Thursday, January 7, 2010, the Associated Press reported that "Clinton and Mitchell [were] scheduled to meet" with Gheit on Friday, January 8, 2010: ABC news here.On Friday, January 8, 2010, Hillary Clinton and Gheit spoke with each other. The U.S. Department of State has provided video before the meeting: Department of State here.On Saturday, January 9, 2010, NPR spoke with Gheit about his visit: NPR.org (much thanks to Grant for the links).
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
MichNews.com: Recognizing and Dealing with Modern Judicial Terrorism
Posted in: JB Williams
By J.B. Williams
Wednesday, November 03, 2010 - 8:17:19 PM ET
Today, the power structure in America is turned upside-down. The Founders gave birth to a nation and government of, by and for the people. Today, our government and nation runs at odds with the vast majority of the people.
In priority of greatest power –
1. The lame stream press – he who controls information controls public sentiment and decisions
2. The nine member oligarchy known as the Supreme Court limited only by their imagination
3. The Executive Branch is free to appoint Czar's outside of congressional or judicial oversight and issue any law it wants under executive order
4. The Legislative Branch is no longer limited by the enumerated powers in the U.S. Constitution
5. States no longer have representation via the U.S.Senate now subservient to the Fed
6. States have no 10th Amendment rights
7. The people are slaves to their rulers spending them generations into debt
In short, the current state of our union today is far worse than that which caused our nation's founders to break from England and toss tea into the Boston Harbor.
The people fear their government. The government is only mildly irritated by those “right-wing extremists” willing to speak out in opposition....
Our state of the union is threatened because the Constitution is not presently in full force or effect. The remedy is to resurrect this document returning it to its proper place as the supreme law of this land. The only thing standing in the way is our corrupt Judicial Branch, which imagines its power as an oligarchy, where only a select few are free to rule over all others via judicial fiat....This article shows just how important the Constitution is.
Jefferson was right and so was Henry.Our Justice Branch presents the greatest threat to individual freedom and liberty in America. Without strict adherence to the Constitution and principles of free-will within, there can be no personal or economic freedom and liberty.
But a nation, in which the judiciary rests all decisions upon the brilliant works of our founders, can be forever free and prosperous.
What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
What God has made free, let no man enslave.
It is not the Constitution that should be judged by the courts, but rather the courts that must be judged by the Constitution. In this country, the American people are the only rightful jury.
Soros Bets on U.S. Financial Collapse
By Cliff Kincaid Monday, November 8, 2010
Another financial expert is expressing his deep disgust with the Federal Reserve’s decision to print more money and buy more U.S. debt, saying it is a sign that the U.S. capitalist system is moving closer to collapse.
“This is the type of stuff we accused the communist and socialist governments of doing—interfering in free markets through currency manipulation,” declared Zubi Diamond, author of The Wizards of Wall Street. “What the Fed is doing is not good for free market capitalism and it is not good for America.”
In an interview with Accuracy in Media, Diamond went on to say, “The Fed is following the economic models of Third World countries by printing more money and devaluing their currencies. If you keep doing what Third World economies do, eventually you will become a Third World economy.”
Monday, November 8, 2010
RESPECT Obama??????
This interloper will lie and do anything to keep you off base.
He is relevant, but at the same time he is irrelevant.
If you are strong enough to handle the lie, then verify.
If you are strong enough to handle the truth, then ignore.
God Bless America!
Saturday, November 6, 2010
A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers: Members of Congress Internal Memo--What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions - Their Talking Points Internal Memo Revealed
Members of Congress Internal Memorandum -- What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions - Their Talking Points Internal Memo Revealed. This was the spin that the Members of Congress were given to keep the American electorate at bay and confused in the debate about Obama's eligibility issues all the while the Congress did nothing to investigate the matter in a congressional hearing like they did for similar concerns about John McCain.
We have obtained a copy of the talking points memorandum put out by a lawyer for the Congressional Research Service to the Members of Congress back in April 2009 as to what to tell their constituents when they write to the Members of Congress and ask questions about Obama's eligibility. Now we know why all the answers coming back to constituents sounded like they were written by the same person and were full of the same obfuscations, omitted facts from history, and half truths & non-truths. This copy was obtained via the diligent and persistent efforts of a patriot going by the pen name of "Tom Deacon" who obtained it from a Senator's office. Now we know the talking points the DC insiders and politicians have been groomed with to feed to their constituents who have been asking questions about the eligibility issues. Thank you Tom. Here is the link to the internal memorandum:
The Internal Congressional Memorandum:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/Members-of-Congress-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-in-Answer-to-Obama-Eligibility-Questions
Revealed: Members of Congress Internal Memo Leaked; What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions | Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records
Members of Congress Internal Memorandum -- What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions - Their Talking Points Internal Memo Revealed. This was the spin that the Members of Congress were given to keep the American electorate at bay and confused in the debate about Obama's eligibility issues all the while the Congress did nothing to investigate the matter in a congressional hearing like they did for similar concerns about John McCain.
We have obtained a copy of the talking points memorandum put out by a lawyer for the Congressional Research Service to the Members of Congress back in April 2009 as to what to tell their constituents when they write to the Members of Congress and ask questions about Obama's eligibility. Now we know why all the answers coming back to constituents sounded like they were written by the same person and were full of the same obfuscations and half truths and non-truths. This copy was obtained via the diligent and persistent efforts of a patriot going by the pen name of "Tom Deacon" who obtained it from a Senator's office. Now we know the talking points the DC insiders and politicians have been groomed with to feed to their constituents who have been asking questions about the eligibility issues. Thank you Tom. Here is the link to the internal memorandum:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/41192270/CRS-Members-of-Congress-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-in-Answer-to-Obama-Eligibility-Questions [Memo Embedded Below]
Monday, November 1, 2010
"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |
Thanks to Ramona and JC for this submission.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Red Tape Rising: Obama's Torrent of New Regulation | The Heritage Foundation
More Obama Change America can't stand. And he still has plans to destroy more of America.
- 1 During fiscal year 2010, 43 new major regulations were adopted by the Obama Administration, with net new burdens on Americans exceeding $26.5 billion each year, a record increase.
- 2 Fifteen of the 43 new major rules involve financial regulation. Another five stem from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. But 10 rules adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency were responsible for the lion’s share of new regulatory costs—some $23.2 billion.
- 3 Only five significant rules adopted in FY 2010 reduced regulatory burdens. Of these, cost reductions were quantified for only two, for reported savings of $1.5 billion.
- 4 Regulatory burdens—and the taxpayer burden—are expected to increase again in 2011 as agencies continue to promulgate new rules related to health care, energy, financial services, and telecommunications.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Update regarding Lt. Col Lakin | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire
I wrote to Margaret Hemenway (Lakin’s public relations person ), to Lakin and to General Vallely. I offered to help. Currently I filed with the Supreme Court a petition for writ of Certiorari, which deals with Capt Dr. Connie Rhodes case (also a flight surgeon) and Major Cook’s case.( see PDF below). I believe, that Lakin’s attorneys need to file an Amicus Brief with the Supreme Court in that case, as I already provided the court with a letter from Captain James Crawford, legal counsel for Admiral Mulin, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff. The letter states, that they are concerned about this issue, they are forwarding it to the litigation counsel, but they don’t believe, that they can do anything, because Commander in Chief is a civilian. It shows, that on behalf of my clients I reached the highest echelons of power in the military and exosted all administrative remedies. Now, it is up to the court to decide. The courts have to provide a venue for both Lakin and my clients and for me. In my case judge Land did not state that there is no standing, he ruled on abstention, stating that he does not want to get into the affairs of the military. On the other hand the military is saying that they cannot do anything, because Obama is a civilian. This is a classic case, where higher courts, specifically the Supreme Court of the United States needs to intervene and resolve this impasse, this conundrum between the military courts and the Federal courts. I will be happy to testify at Lakin’s trial, if his attorneys want me to testify and will be happy to help in any way I can. I was persecuted, I was punished with $20,000 sanctions for daring to bring a case agains a sitting president. I can really appreciate, what Lakin is going through. I consider Lt. Col Lakin a great American Hero and he deserves all the help, that he can get. God bless him.Orly
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Gasparino: Wall Street Will Back Obama in 2012
“It’s a hedge,” he says. “Wall Street likes divided government, but the question is will they support this president, and I believe in 2012 they will. They are telling me that they are willing to support him as much as they support a Republican.”Time to support Anti Obama, pro Capitalist Business:
Story Continues Below
Financial journalist Charlie Gasparino discusses his latest book, Bought and Paid For He explains why he thinks Obama public bashing of Wall Street was duplicitous He also explains who would get hurt the most by letting the Bush tax cuts expire
And why is that? It’s because the White House and Wall Street have engaged in crony capitalism, Gasparino says.
“These big companies like GE, like the big Wall Street firms, make money more than Main Street when big government starts doling out the benefits,” he says. “They know that the Republican Party’s activist wing is the tea partyers, who are dead set against crony capitalism, dead set against bailouts.”
We must direct our money and our investments.
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Dinesh D'Souza' Website
In The Roots of Obama's Rage you'll learn: Why Obama's economic policies are actually designed to make America poorer compared to the rest of the world Why Obama will welcome a nuclear Iran Why Obama sees America as a rogue nation — worse than North Korea The real reason Obama banished a bust of Winston Churchill from the White House and ordered NASA to praise the scientific contributions of Muslims Why Obama would like to make America's superpower status a thing of the past...As American's we are not schooled to believe in evil, or even bad people that can hate America. That is why the Libs are so effective.
We are today living out the script for America and the world that was dreamt up not by Obama but by Obama's father. How do I know this? Because Obama says so himself. Reflect for a moment on the title of his book: it's not Dreams of My Father but rather Dreams from My Father. In other words, Obama is not writing a book about his father's dreams; he is writing a book about the dreams that he got from his father.Think about what this means. The most powerful country in the world is being governed according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s — a polygamist who abandoned his wives, drank himself into stupors, and bounced around on two iron legs (after his real legs had to be amputated because of a car crash caused by his drunk driving). This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anti-colonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son is the one who is making it happen, but the son is, as he candidly admits, only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is being governed by a ghost.
No one believes they would lie, and no one believes they are doing it intentional, but they are.
Conservatives Behind the Curve on Obama
I hate to say, “We told you so,” but Herb Romerstein and I held a briefing in May 0f 2008 in Washington, D.C. releasing two reports, “Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection,” and “Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection.” Then, in August of 2008, I released the 600-page FBI file on Frank Marshall Davis. The response from the media included Dana Milbank of The Washington Post making fun of us and Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report refusing to run paid advertising on the Obama-Davis connection. The liberal and conservative media had their heads in the sand. They couldn’t come to grips with the unprecedented prospect of a possible agent of influence for the international Marxist movement occupying the Oval Office.This is for those of you that still refuse to face facts. Keep it up and see where you end up.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Drop Fox | Media Matters for America
Tides Foundation CEO Drummond Pike's full letter to Fox News advertisers:
Dear Fox Advertiser,
I am writing to ask your company to take a simple step that may well save lives in the future. And it is not unimportant that taking this action will remove your company and its products from any connection to what could very likely be an unpleasant tragedy, should things remain as they are today. On behalf of my organization, and many others like it, I ask that you cease advertising on the Fox News Channel.
This is neither a hollow request, nor one rhetorically made. There is an urgency to it born of our own direct experience as the target of a would-be assassin inspired by Fox's Glenn Beck Show.
So you think it isn't so.
Decrees Of Separation - IBD - Investors.com
Tea Party-favored Republican nominee Christine O'Donnell had the temerity to ask her opponent to cite the provision of the Constitution that separates church and state.
There is, of course, no such passage. Those scoffing law scholars might want to look at the Constitution's unadorned text instead of the judicial activist law review articles that take up so much of their day.
What the Constitution does say, in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, is that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" — a restriction imposed upon the state to prevent its interference in religious practice.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Troops chafe at restrictive rules of engagement, talks with Taliban | Washington Examiner
Why do Democrats like to loose and sacrifice America's finest? Why do they sacrifice our friends and negotiate with the enemy?
If they like to loose so much, maybe they will be personally granted their wish in this election.
To quote Scary Reid, "The War is Lost." What he left out is "If Democrats get their way."
From 2010 on, it is the time to replace all Democrats.
Can you name one Dem that will protect this country, much less defeat America's enemy?
In 2012 start with the Resident in Chief. That would be the most powerful anti American, Muslim terrorist supporter, corrupt Justice Department Ruller, Illegal White House Resident America has ever seen.
God Bless America!
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Obama Times Update
Does anyone have the courage to support Resident Obama and his ideals, or lack of?
I'm betting no one does.
Editorial: Government – The Enemy From Within - Galganov.com
Can the government survive without the PRIVATE SECTOR?If you still a Lib, read this!
NOT IN A MILLION YEARS!
Can the average non-government employed person survive without the government?
YOU BET!
Can the average non-government employed person survive without the PRIVATE SECTOR?
NOT A CHANCE!
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
WLS-AM 890
Another Liberal State brakes the Law.(Graeme Robertson/Getty Images)
By Adam Zielinski
CHICAGO (WLS) - The U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether the state of Illinois missed the deadline for mailing absentee ballots to members of the military and other overseas American voters as part of a new federal overseas voting law.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Thursday, October 7, 2010
AEI - Scholars - Michael Rubin
If you want to know what Resident Obama is doing to our security you might want to read some of the articles written by Michael Rubin.
How Obama Thinks - Forbes.com
Barack Obama is the most antibusiness president in a generation, perhaps in American history. Thanks to him the era of big government is back. Obama runs up taxpayer debt not in the billions but in the trillions. He has expanded the federal government's control over home mortgages, investment banking, health care, autos and energy. The Weekly Standard summarizes Obama's approach as omnipotence at home, impotence abroad....
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Sebelius Waives Obamacare Rules for McDonalds, Teachers’ Union « Liberty Central
McDonalds attracted a great deal of attention a few days back, when the company informed the Department of Health and Human Services that without a waiver from the requirements of the recently-passed health care bill, the chain would be forced to drop insurance coverage for its employees. After national media focused on McDonalds’ request, they have gotten their waiver:More Obama corruption to follow:
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers
AMESBURG, NJ – (Sept. 30, 2010) - Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ, today filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC, on behalf of plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lehigh County, PA; Lowell T. Patterson, Burlington County, NJ; Darrell J. LeNormand, Middlesex County, NJ; and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., Middlesex County, NJ. Plaintiffs are challenging the recent decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, PA, which affirmed the dismissal by District Judge, Jerome Simandle, sitting in the Federal District Court, Camden, NJ, of plaintiffs’ lawsuit in which they charge that Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, has NOT conclusively proven to any controlling legal authority that he is an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 “natural born Citizen of the United States” and thus constitutionally eligible to serve as the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military, and that he has hidden all his early life records including his original long-form birth certificate, early school records, college records, travel and passport records needed to prove he is even a born Citizen of the United States
Obama was born a British Subject/Citizen to a British Subject/Citizen father and a U.S. citizen mother. Obama's father was not a U.S. Citizen and never intended to be one. Obama's father was never even an immigrant to the USA nor was he even a permanent legal resident. Obama's father was a foreign national sojourning in the USA to attend college. Obama is still a British Subject/Citizen to this day because he has never renounced that citizenship. According to this lawsuit, Obama was born a dual-citizen with dual allegiance and loyalty and is therefore not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military. The founders of our country and framers of our Constitution required the President to have unity of citizenship and sole natural allegiance to the USA from the moment of birth, which Obama does not and cannot have. This was a national security issue to the founders and framers.Obama has multiple foreign allegiance claims on him because of his British citizenship which also converted to Kenyan citizenship at age 2. Obama was also an Indonesian citizen as a youth when he was adopted or acknowledged by his Indonesian step-father when he married his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. The lawsuit seeks a trial on the merits to determine the true facts of Obama’s legal identity and exact citizenship status and to require Obama to prove to the courts that he is eligible for the federal office he sits in per our Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which states: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
The legal term of art, natural born citizen, is defined by the world renowned legal scholar, Emer de Vattel, in his pre-eminent legal treatise and enlightenment to the world of jurisprudence in the revolutionary period, The Lawof Nations or Principles of Natural Law, published in 1758, and which was used by the founders by the Continental Congress during the formation of our country and by the framers of our U.S. Constitution, and whose definition of natural born Citizen is incorporated in several U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Vattel and U.S. Supreme Court decisions agree that a natural born citizen is a person born in the country to two parents who are both citizens of the country. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, nor even an immigrant to the USA. Thus Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA, and that is the reason for the lawsuit.
The original lawsuit was filed early in the morning of January 20, 2009, before Obama was sworn in. The case was dragged out by delays by the government in addressing the case and deciding on whether the case would proceed to a fact finding trial on the merits or not. The courts have decided that it will not go to the merits and have dismissed the case using technical and procedural tactics to keep the Plaintiffs from getting to the merits of the charges.
