Thursday, June 30, 2011

Top Obama Advisor: Homeland is “Primary” Focus of Counterterrorism

Top Obama Advisor: Homeland is “Primary” Focus of Counterterrorism
In a press conference Tuesday, deputy national security advisor for Homeland Security and counterterrorism, John Brennan, outlined some of the details:

‘This is the first counterterrorism strategy that focuses on the ability of al Qaeda and its network to inspire people in the United States to attack us from within,’ he said in a speech at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. ‘Indeed, this is the first counterterrorism strategy that designates the homeland as a primary area of emphasis in our counterterrorism efforts.’

These statements alone seem to indicate that Americans can expect more domestic surveillance, warrantless wiretapping, citizen spy programs and other guilty-until-proven innocent violations of their rights. In a chest-thumping admission, Brennan said they’ll use a “relentless campaign that harnesses every element of American power” to fight the war on terror.

In other words, it seems the full power of the American war machine will be turned inward to monitor and respond to Al Qaeda’s “affiliates and its adherents” on American soil....

Brennan also stated very clearly that they will not profile American Muslims; “Muslim Americans are not part of the problem, they are part of the solution,” he said, adding ”when we show that Muslim Americans are part of our American family, we expose al Qaeda’s lie that cultures must clash.”

There they go again claiming that al Qaeda “hates us for our freedoms.” So, if we just remove some of those freedoms, perhaps they won’t hate us as much. But don’t mess with rights of American Muslims, though, because it may stoke anger with the cave-dwelling bogeymen. Clearly, profiling Muslims won’t likely catch anybody dangerous either, since the war on terror is a proven fraud with nearly every recent attack openly run by the FBI as part of entrapment schemes.

Get ready for the next wave of "loss of freedom" for American citizens only.

Other headlines of interest:

justice-department-to-conduct-full-probe-cia-interrogations

north-korea-head-un-conference-disarmament

The normal citizen just can't make this stuff up.

The real kooks are the Obama Regime, the UN, and the Liberal Dems and Rinos.

I'm afraid that they are going to give Don the Kook a bad name.

The Rich Liberal Left to buy elections. Soros spends Millions to buy Judges and Secretaries of State | The Citizen

The Rich Liberal Left to buy elections. Soros spends Millions to buy Judges and Secretaries of State | The Citizen

Soros' Open Society set aside a cool $5 Million for what they call "Judicial Selection". One of Soros’ priorities is to replace elections for judges with “selection-by-committee.” also known as "Merit" Selections. The Left uses courts to usurp the will of the people. You don't want Gay Marriage too bad they will just sue for it. Bake Sales, no way, sue you over that too. So if the Left i.e. Soros can stack enough Federal Positions with his "Merit" selected Judges then court outcomes will no longer be so risky because of that darned Constitution.

Additionally to Soros funding a take over of the Judiciary process he also has funded the campaigns of 11 Secretaries of State. His "SOSP" Secretary of State Project declared mission is to place "reform" minded Democrats in charge of state election offices, where key decisions often are made in close races on which ballots are counted and which are not.
In other words to control Elections and their outcomes. According to SOSP's website their goal is to elect non-partisan "Clean" representatives, but by there very own statement I don't think "reform" minded equals non-partisan.

What is it Soros doesn't control? Yet?

George Soros and the Muslim Brotherhood | FrontPage Magazine

George Soros and the Muslim Brotherhood | FrontPage Magazine

But there may be more in play here than simple fairness and wishful thinking on Muasher’s part. He happens to oversee research for the Middle East at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, funded by leftist multi-billionaire George Soros, one of the world’s most politically influential men. Soros is waging his own personal ideological war against America by shoveling seemingly limitless funds into organizations giving life to his “progressive” vision of social justice.

That vision, like the Muslim Brotherhood’s, identifies America and Israel as the “Great Satan” and “Little Satan” respectively, who must be demolished to pave the way for a purifying, redemptive utopia. These common enemies unite progressives and Islamic fundamentalists in what David Horowitz has coined an “unholy alliance.” As Andrew C. McCarthy writes in The Grand Jihad, “With their collectivist philosophy, transnational outlook, totalitarian demands, and revolutionary designs, Islamists are natural allies of the radical Left.”

Soros the real "Great Satan"?

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

CIA - The World Factbook

CIA - The World Factbook for USA
Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
$47,200 (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 11
$46,400 (2009 est.)
$48,100 (2008 est.)
note: data are in 2010 US dollars

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
agriculture: 1.2%
industry: 22.2%
services: 76.7% (2010 est.)

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
154.9 million
country comparison to the world: 4
note: includes unemployed (2010 est.)

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
farming, forestry, and fishing: 0.7%
manufacturing, extraction, transportation, and crafts: 20.3%
managerial, professional, and technical: 37.3%
sales and office: 24.2%
other services: 17.6%
note: figures exclude the unemployed (2009)

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
9.7% (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 106
9.3% (2009 est.)

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
12% (2004 est.)









CIA - The World Factbook for China
Note: GDP per Capita of $7,600, Labor Force of 780 million, and Official Poverty Line of $90 per year
Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
$7,600 (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 126
$6,900 (2009 est.)
$6,400 (2008 est.)
note: data are in 2010 US dollars

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
agriculture: 9.6%
industry: 46.8%
services: 43.6% (2010 est.)

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
780 million (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 1

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
agriculture: 38.1%
industry: 27.8%
services: 34.1% (2008 est.)

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
4.3% (September 2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 41
4.2% (December 2008 est.)
note: official data for urban areas only; including migrants may boost total unemployment to 9%; substantial unemployment and underemployment in rural areas

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
2.8%
note: 21.5 million rural population live below the official "absolute poverty" line (approximately $90 per year); an additional 35.5 million rural population live above that level but below the official "low income" line (approximately $125 per year) (2007)

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 1: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg

Why China’s Heading for a Hard Landing, Part 1: A. Gary Shilling - Bloomberg
Part 1
But before you worry about China’s becoming No. 1 any time soon, consider the remaining gap between its economy and the U.S. economy. In 2009, China’s GDP was $4.9 trillion, only 34 percent of the U.S.’s $14.3 trillion. Because China has 1.32 billion people, or 4.3 times as many as the U.S. has, the gap in per-capita GDP was even bigger: China’s $3,709 was only 8 percent of the U.S.’s $46,405.
Part 2

Unsustainable Growth

Here’s what we should remember: This kind of growth is unsustainable, and it won’t be able to cover up China’s underlying vulnerabilities forever.

Part 3
China is hoping to cool its white- hot economy without precipitating a recession. Doing so will be extremely difficult: Inflation fears are growing, the government’s ability to respond is quite limited, and China’s economic model, which leaves bureaucrats guessing about the market effects of their directives, is ultimately untenable.
My assessment:
China has an economic model that isn't sustainable in a country like America that is based on freedom, until the Ruling Class can indoctrinate the future generations.
The current US regime is attempting to create the same model in the US, a Ruling Elite Class (Democrats and Rino's) and a Middle Class for all the rest of us, consisting of dependent slaves or peasants- as is illustrated by The Oppressed Monkey.

Ironic that this Coup is being championed by a black leader. But could it happen otherwise?

The Ruling Class must be stopped in the next election. Obama and the Liberals, both Democrats and Rino's, in Congress must be defeated and their extortion campaign financing must bankrupt many of the primary contributors to the Ruling Class in the process.

The Constitution must be protected. The Courts and Justice Department need to be restored to following US Constitutional Law, not just the Chicago Law.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Soros and liberal groups seeking top election posts in battleground states - Washington Times

Soros and liberal groups seeking top election posts in battleground states - Washington Times

The group’s website said it wants to stop Republicans from “manipulating” election results.

“Any serious commitment to wresting control of the country from the Republican Party must include removing their political operatives from deciding who can vote and whose votes will count,” the group said on its website, accusing some Republican secretaries of state of making “partisan decisions.”

SOSP has sought donations by describing the contributions as a “modest political investment” to elect “clean candidates” to the secretary of state posts.

Named after Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, so-called 527 political groups — such as SOSP — have no upper limit on contributions and no restrictions on who may contribute in seeking to influence the selection, nomination, election, appointment or defeat of candidates to federal, state or local public office. They generally are not regulated by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), creating a soft-money loophole.

While FEC regulations limit individual donations to a maximum of $2,500 per candidate and $5,000 to a PAC, a number of 527 groups have poured tens of millions of unregulated dollars into various political efforts.

SOSP has backed 11 winning candidates in 18 races, including such key states as Ohio, Nevada, Iowa, New Mexico and Minnesota.

Advertised corruption, the Chicago way.

What no law, or just no law enforcement?

EconomicPolicyJournal.com: U.S. Bring in Foreign National to Attack Google?

EconomicPolicyJournal.com: U.S. Bring in Foreign National to Attack Google?
Robert Wenzel
Editor & Publisher rw@economicpolicyjournal.com

Yesterday, I pointed S.M. Oliva's take on the odd hiring of a Brit, Dr. Alison Oldale, to head the Federal Trade Commission as Deputy Director for Antitrust in the Bureau of Economics.

News today that the FTC is, as WSJ puts it, "ready to formally declare war against Google" has Oliva thinking about the hiring of a foreign national and the coming attack on Google. Here's more from WSJ:
Will they really go after Google, or will they cover for Google? That is the question.

It is fund raising time. They might settle for a LARGE donation to the Obama Coup. They need at least $1 Billion to reinstall a unsuccessful (from a pro American point of view) and illegitimate Resident in the White House. After all, that is the standard procedure in Chicago, and now Washington.

Obama's Fraudulent Certificate of Live Birth

Obama's Fraudulent Certificate of Live Birth

This article was written by Robert Moore:
The Lid Slams Shut or The Miracle of the Three Stamps
Here are the sides of the box:
1. April 25th Judith Corley, by order of the PRESIDENT retrieves from Fuddy and Onaka TWO hand made indisputably authenticated for the PRESIDENT Documents. We can call these Documents A & B.
2. April 27th Prior to the hasty special PRESIDENT”S news conference on the morning of the 27th Attorney Savannah Guthrie, NBC News super star, legal analyst and soon to be host of the G.E. affiliated network’s Today Show and Obama approved document wizard, reviews and inspects, as the only human on the planet qualified, one of the TWO Documents. It has no smiley face and she proclaims it's embossed. No smiley face is: Document A. I believe.
3. April 27th. Obama guarantees and authenticates the process, procedure and officiates at the baptism of the authentic documents just handed out to the White House press Corps. He asks for an end to this silliness. He orders a posting on the White House Web page of a document: a simple scan to Adobe pdf. and a web publish. No problemo. It has to be Document A or B.
4. This side is no problem. We all have access. Maybe we have a copy. It’s the publishing of the White House pdf. The official Obama approved, handled, ordered, Attorney retrieved and scanned and uploaded Document. We see it matches the handout. And as we see it doesn’t match the Guthrie photo. This document has a smiley face as does the handout. The Guthrie photo does not. Which document is this? It has no smiley face. It does match the handout’s smiley face. The Guthrie photo has no smiley face and it’s Document A. Therefore it’s Document B, the missing Document of TWO. I believe. And now so should you.
.
Let me tell you about the miracle of the three stamps. It is completely impossible for a human being to place 2 pieces of paper side by side and strike them both in the same exact identical place with a rubber stamp. Try it. Get your bank deposit stamp, a date stamp, even your kids’ toy stamp kit that stamps a flower, ink it, stamp it once on a sheet of paper and strike it again on a piece of paper along side, one that’s the same size, try it on lined paper. Place the 2 sheets afterwards in perfect alignment on top of each other, edge to edge, as one, and hold them up to the light. Do you see one stamp? Are they perfect overlapping mates? Or did you miss the spot? Now imagine that you have TWO documents that require three hand applied stamps. Each one stamped for date. Each one stamped for registrar. Each one crimped and therefore embossed by hand or in an electric official embosser. And they are for the PRESIDENT, That’s 6 stamps hand applied. Try it, ask your notary to do this, and you will see it’s impossible for a human to hand stamp 2 individual documents each in 3 places in the identical and perfect same place. This can only occur in printing. It can only be like matching labels or 2 aces of whatever from separate but alike decks of cards. It cannot happen by hand. I beg you to try, for the PRESIDENT. This is the lid and it slams shut here. The Guthrie photo when enlarged to the same exact size as the White House pdf. and both of them as I have pointed out are different: Document A is the Guthrie photo, no smiley face, Document B is the White House pdf with a smiley face, and while these are clearly TWO distinguishable documents A& B they happen to have 3 stamps in the exact same place and when they are overlapped or superimposed or measured by any means possible are like the labels of 2 mayonnaise jars or copies made at the same time. This is a miracle or final proof of a forgery. You can’t have exactly mapped stamps times one let alone times three on TWO different documents. But by Obama’s truth we have the miracle of the 3 stamps. I believe and so should you. Try it for yourself. If you succeed you are a forger or Obama.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
April 27, 2011

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

8:48 A.M. EDT

MR. PFEIFFER: We'll be happy to take some questions.

Q I guess I just want to make sure that we’re clear on this. Even though this one says “certificate of live birth” on here, this is different than the other certificate of live birth that we’ve seen?

MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. The second page there is the one that was posted on the Internet.

Q Okay.

MR. PFEIFFER: And that is a copy of the one that has been kept at the Hawaii Department of Health.

Q Okay. And this is the one that would be referred to -- that people have been asking for that is the birth certificate?

MR. PFEIFFER: They are both -- the second one is the birth certificate. The one on the top is what is referred to as the long-form birth certificate. As you can see -- and Bob can walk you through it -- it contains some additional information that is not on the second page, which was the birth certificate which was released during the campaign.

If you could just explain the difference.

MR. BAUER: There’s a difference between a certificate and a certification. The certification is simply a verification of certain information that’s in the original birth certificate. The birth certificate, as you can see, has signatures at the bottom from the attending physician, the local registrar, who essentially oversees the maintenance of the records. It contains some additional information also -- that is to say, the original birth certificate -- it contains some additional information like the ages of the parents, birthplaces, residence, street address, the name of the hospital.

The core information that’s required for legal purposes and that is put into the actual certification that’s a computer-generated document, which we posted in 2008, that information is abstracted, if you will, from the original birth certificate, put into the computerized short-form certification, and made available to Hawaiian residents at their request.

So the long form, which is a certificate, has more information, but the short form has the information that’s legally sufficient for all the relevant purposes.

Q This first one has never been released publicly, correct?

MR. BAUER: That’s correct. It is in a bound volume in the records at the state Department of Health in Hawaii.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Alinksi Does Afghanistan, Part II - By Andrew C. McCarthy - The Corner - National Review Online

Alinksi Does Afghanistan, Part II - By Andrew C. McCarthy - The Corner - National Review Online

Okay, okay, I got the unemployment rate wrong — it’s actually higher than 12 percent if you consider the real rather than the cooked numbers. More significantly, I failed to account for the possibility that our forces would find and kill bin Laden. That feat — in Pakistan, where we obviously don’t have 100,000 troops — made last night a no-brainer: Obama would declare “mission accomplished” and not worry about a somnolent American media asking how we could have surged to defeat the Taliban while simultaneously negotiating with the Taliban and calling for the Taliban’s inclusion in any Afghan political settlement. What I said 18 months ago remains true today: Obama’s plan “would be preposterous if it were actually a national-security strategy. But it’s not. It’s a political strategy.” It doesn’t need to be coherent or effective. It needs to get Obama through 2012.

Andrew McCarthy knows Obama and tells it like it is.

Something everybody knows, but is afraid to say, or at least admit even to themselves.

Is the FBI Investigating Obama?

Is the FBI Investigating Obama?

This is an unusual investigation that does not primarily involve Islamists. Instead, it is focused on elements of the old international communist networks that many people mistakenly thought had faded away with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Those under investigation are suspected of providing support to foreign terrorist organizations such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in the Middle East, a Marxist group. The Post called them “Colombian and Palestinian groups designated by the U.S. government as terrorists.”

The investigations came into public view last September when the FBI raided the homes of several “activists,” as the Post called them. Some lived in Chicago.

The story gets better.

But the answer to the headline question is, No, but they should.

Boeing Grounded - Investors.com

Boeing Grounded - Investors.com

The Associated Press traces Airbus' popularity to the fuel efficiency of its A320neo, a twin-engine airliner comparable to Boeing's 737. Maybe. But there might be another factor: Boeing's inability to deliver.

In 2008, an eight-week strike among Boeing's unionized workers delayed the delivery of as many as 80 planes and hindered development of Boeing's 787, a twin-engine midsize airliner that will burn 20% less fuel than other aircraft in its class.

Thanks to the strike, initial deliveries of the 787 Dreamliner were postponed by more than a year, according to regulatory filings by American Airlines, one of Boeing's affected customers.

To dilute the risk of future obstructions, Boeing built a $750 million plant in North Charleston, S.C., to assemble about 30% of its 787 Dreamliner fleet. Jim Albaugh, a Boeing executive, told the Seattle Times last year that the company, which has also added 2,000 workers in Washington to build the 787 — decided to locate a plant in right-to-work South Carolina because "we can't afford to have a work stoppage every three years."

Unwilling to let a private company freely run its business, the Obama administration, through its appointees on the National Labor Relations Board, is trying to block the South Carolina option. The NLRB has sued Boeing, claiming its North Charleston plant is an illegal retaliation against government-coddled — the last two words are ours — unions.

Just another Obama plan to bring America down to his Kenyan level. This is what he specializing in doing.
It's much easier to bring down, or destroy, than to build. Of course Obama has never built anything.

Too bad America hasn't caught on yet.

But then again, it took the Jews a while too.

America's Survival

America's Survival

BREAKING NEWS: Is the FBI Investigating Obama?

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Good Riddance… Obama’s Radical Safe Schools Czar Hits the Skids | The Gateway Pundit

Good Riddance… Obama’s Radical Safe Schools Czar Hits the Skids | The Gateway Pundit

Too disgusting to believe, but with the Obama Regime it is the norm.

Right Wing News » Blog Archive » Lid Ready to Blow on Obama Regime’s Mexican Gunrunning Scandal

Right Wing News » Blog Archive » Lid Ready to Blow on Obama Regime’s Mexican Gunrunning Scandal
Written By : Dave Blount

If anything could be more appalling than the fact that these guns have gotten Americans killed, it could only be the Obama Regime’s apparent motive:

ATF Agent John Dodson, testifying in front of the committee, said that in his entire law enforcement career, he had “never been involved in or even heard of an operation in which law enforcement officers let guns walk.” He continued: “I cannot begin to think of how the risk of letting guns fall into the hands of known criminals could possibly advance any legitimate law enforcement interest.”

The obvious answer is that Gunwalker’s objective was never intended to be a “legitimate law enforcement interest.” Instead, it appears that ATF Acting Director Ken Melson and Department of Justice senior executives specifically created an operation that was designed from the outset to arm Mexican narco-terrorists and increase violence substantially along both sides of the Southwest border.

Success was measured not by the number of criminals being incarcerated, but by the number of weapons transiting the border and the violence those weapons caused. An ATF manager was “delighted” when Gunwalker guns started showing up at drug busts. It would be entirely consistent with this theory if DOJ communications reflected the approval of the ATF senior officials they were colluding with — but as we know, Holder’s Department of Justice refuses to cooperate.

At the same time in 2009 that federal law enforcement agencies (the ATF, the DOJ, and presumably Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security) were creating the operation that led to the executive branch being the largest gun smuggler in the Southwest, the president’s team was crafting the rhetoric to sell the crisis they were creating.

On television, in various news outlets, and even in a joint appearance with Mexican President Felipe Calderon, Obama pushed the 90 percent lie, implying that 90% of the guns recovered in Mexican cartel violence came from U.S. gun shops.

At the same time they were damning gun dealers in public, the administration was secretly forcing them to provide weapons to the cartels, by the armful and without oversight. More than one gun industry insider suggests that the administration extorted cooperation and silence from these gun shops. As the ATF has the power to summarily shut dealers down for the most minor of offenses, that is very, very possible.

The purpose was to create leverage to use against the Second Amendment. That is, our rulers facilitated the smuggling in an attempt to cause mayhem that could be used to attack the constitutional liberties they have sworn to uphold. “You never want a serious crisis go to waste,” said Obama henchman Rahm Emanuel. If the crisis isn’t there, make it.

Maybe the final question will be, Will the other Liberals and their socialist edicts go down with Obama and his regime? We can only HOPE so.

Us Supreme Court Precedent States That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President. | Before It's News

Us Supreme Court Precedent States That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President. | Before It's News

It can no longer be denied that there is controlling US Supreme Court precedent concerning the definition of a natural-born citizen according to Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution. I predict satori will overcome those of you who have labored over this issue. This is not a remote obscure reading. It is, when revealed, a clear undeniable holding and binding precedent established by the highest Court of our nation which specifically defines an Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizen as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens.

Therefore, Obama – according to US Supreme Court precedent – is not eligible to be President.

PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED BY MINOR V. HAPPERSETT

The direct US Supreme Court precedent is stated in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875). Furthermore, the precedent stated in Minor is consistent with other US Supreme Court cases – both before and after Minor – which discuss the natural born citizen issue. While that part of the holding in Minor regarding woman’s suffrage was superseded by the 19th Amendment – which Constitutionally established a woman’s right to vote – the rest of the case is good law. And the remaining precedent stated regarding the definition of “natural-born citizen” – with regard to Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution – is still binding upon all lower courts.

Was there ever any real doubt?

The question remains, do U.S.Courts still follow the law?

I would say it's a 4 to 5 bet or maybe a 5 to 4 bet.

USDA Food Aid Programs: Fact Sheet

USDA Food Aid Programs: Fact Sheet
The interagency Food Assistance Policy Council, chaired by USDA’s Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services, coordinates U.S. food aid policies and programs. The council includes representatives from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), USAID, the U.S. Department of State, and USDA. At the staff level, USAID and USDA meet regularly to review and coordinate plans. In addition, USAID and USDA work together to combine smaller shipments of commodities into larger ones, maximizing the funds available for transportation.
Just another one world government program that helps the Obama Campaign Regime raise reelection money from foreign sources while increasing control of U.S. markets.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Pajamas Media » What — and Who — Made ‘Gunwalker’ Tick?

Pajamas Media » What — and Who — Made ‘Gunwalker’ Tick?
June 20, 2011 - 12:12 pm - by Mike McDanie

Unfortunately, the Obama administration tends to have substantial difficulty identifying actual security threats and in telling the difference between America’s enemies and allies. The Holder DOJ also tends to want to treat even the most egregious terrorist threats as common crimes suitable for prosecution in the criminal courts.

We are left with the knowledge that the ATF ignored common sense and its own procedures — and that at least two American LEOs and at least 150 Mexican LEOs have to date paid the price. The highest levels of the ATF and the Holder DOJ are apparently willing to blatantly lie, and to appear to be incompetent. But why?

Is it possible that managers at the highest levels of the ATF truly believed that they were working a competent, significant law enforcement operation that would result in spectacular, international results? There is evidence that acting ATF head Kenneth Melson was intimately involved, including his request for IP addresses of cameras hidden in an Arizona gun shop so that he could watch straw purchases being made, but this could be little more than neophyte voyeurism. Even considering the enormous practicality and experience gulf that commonly exists between law enforcers and federal managers, this seems unlikely. That level of idiocy is probably rare, even in the federal government.

More likely is that Melson and others were pursuing Obama administration policies in pursuit of gun controls they could not secure through legislative means. Obtaining policy goals in this way is a common Obama administration tactic, and there is reason to believe, including the often repeated lie that 90% of the guns used illegally in Mexico come from America — stated by Mr. Obama himself — that this may be the case. But if so, it would suggest a willingness to pursue unpopular and arguably unconstitutional policies regardless of the consequences. This too is a common Obama administration tactic. It would also suggest an appalling lack of concern for the lives of American and Mexican LEOs and citizens.

There remain only two alternatives: that the managers of the ATF truly are stunningly incompetent — or that they are willing to appear to be dangerously incompetent to protect others, others in higher positions, because the truth is worse, much worse.

Is there any way to stop this illegitimate Regime?

Contrary to the Top Gun quote: "It's not looking good so far."

The PJ Tatler » Christian Adams

The PJ Tatler » Christian Adams

This is for those that are looking for credible news.

Accuracy In Media

Accuracy In Media


What a Leader versus What, a leader?

Monday, June 20, 2011

Weekly Wrap Up by Allen West

Weekly Wrap Up
We are also becoming more aware of the reckless and irresponsible actions of the Obama administration in the conduct of Operation Fast and Furious. We now know the Obama Justice Department oversaw an operation whereby weapons were flooded into the Mexican drug cartel resulting in the death of a U.S. Border Patrol agent by one of these weapons.

We know certain agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) sent up warning signs on this operation which went unheeded. The time for discussion is over. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder must resign, and anything less is unacceptable!

Along the same lines, it seems the Obama Administration is also showing its colors when it comes to support of labor unions. The suit filed by the National Labor Relations Board, in the case of Boeing moving a plant operation to the right-to-work state of South Carolina, is unconscionable. Since when does the federal government dictate to a private sector corporation where it can establish its operations? Oops, sorry, rhetorical question there. Ever since we got the President CEO-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama, the rules of the free market/free enterprise have changed. Just ask a former auto industry CEO.

For us here in Florida, just let me remind you, we are a right-to-work state as well. So go git ‘em Governor Nikki Haley!

Lastly, even though outgoing Secretary of Defense Gates believes all nations lie to each other, do allies arrest each other’s informants as we saw Pakistan arrest five CIA informants this week?

And just when it seems everyone had forgotten Army Major Malik Nidal Hassan - who still has not been brought to trial -we now have naturalized Ethiopian Marine Reserve Lance Corporal Yonathan Melaku who has been arrested in a Pentagon terrorist scare. Never forget the U.S. Army after action report from the shooting at Ft. Hood- it never mentioned Islamic terrorism, jihadism, or Muslim extremism or infiltration.

History has a wicked way of teaching repetitive lessons to those who fail to learn from it.
Now this is a leader, and a brave one at that.

We sure could use one in the White House.

Entitlement Spending: Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid Charts

Entitlement Spending: Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid Charts

Some charts for the Liberals in the audience.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

TrevorLoudon.com: New Zeal Blog » Panetta Report 3: Leon Panetta and the Santa Cruz Socialists

TrevorLoudon.com: New Zeal Blog » Panetta Report 3: Leon Panetta and the Santa Cruz Socialists
It is now fairly well known that President Barack Obama enjoyed a close relationship with the socialists, Trotskyites and “former” communists, who made up the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America.

It is less well known that while a California Congressman, Obama’s Secretary of Defense nominee Leon Panetta also worked closely with Santa Cruz based members of the US’s largest Marxist organization.

Just when you thought the worst was over.

It just keeps on coming.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Lanny Breuer - Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Criminal Division - WhoRunsGov.com/TheWashingtonPost

Lanny Breuer - Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Criminal Division - WhoRunsGov.com/TheWashingtonPost

Background of key figure in "Fast and Furious."

WhoRunsGov.com from The Washington Post - Profiles of Government Decision-Makers

WhoRunsGov.com from The Washington Post - Profiles of Government Decision-Makers

Releases/Statements

Releases/Statements
June 2011

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform



You can get video, sometimes live, and data about the ATF and Department of Justice stonewalling the committee just like every other corrupt organization in this Regime.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Report: Four ATF Agents Working on Controversial Operation ‘Fast and Furious’ Tell their Story

Report: Four ATF Agents Working on Controversial Operation ‘Fast and Furious’ Tell their Story

Agents say DOJ still being untruthful about efforts to let guns ‘walk’ into hands of drug cartels

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) today released a report, “The Department of Justice’s Operation Fast and Furious: Accounts of ATF Agents.” The report includes testimony from four Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) agents offering firsthand accounts about the controversial Operation Fast and Furious that allowed suspects to walk away with illegally purchased guns. Two of the approximately 2,000 guns that ATF let criminals walk away with were found at the murder scene of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in December 2010.


“ATF agents have shared chilling accounts of being ordered to stand down as criminals in Arizona walked away with guns headed for Mexican drug cartels,” said Rep. Issa. “With the clinical precision of a lab experiment, the Justice Department kept records of weapons they let walk and the crime scenes where they next appeared. To agents’ shock, preventing loss of life was not the primary concern.”


“These agents have risked their lives working for the ATF and they’ve risked their careers by coming forward to speak the truth about a dangerous strategy that was doomed from the start,” Sen. Grassley said. “The report shows the street agents’ perspective on this risky policy to let guns walk. It should help people who are wondering what really happened during Operation Fast and Furious understand why we are continuing to investigate.”

Highlights of the report include:


  • The supervisor of Operation Fast and Furious was “jovial, if not, not giddy but just delighted about” walked guns showing up at crime scenes in Mexico according to an ATF agent. (p. 37)
  • Another ATF agent told the committee about a prediction he made a year ago that “someone was going to die” and that the gunwalking operation would be the subject of a Congressional investigation. (p. 24)
  • The shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords created a “state of panic” within the group conducting the operation as they initially feared a “walked” gun might have been used. (p. 38)
  • One Operation Fast and Furious Agent: “I cannot see anyone who has one iota of concern for human life being okay with this …” (p. 27)
  • An ATF agent predicted to committee investigators that more deaths will occur as a result of Operation Fast and Furious. (p.39)
  • Multiple agents told the committee that continued assertions by Department of Justice Officials that guns were not knowingly “walked” and that DOJ tried to stop their transport to Mexico are clearly untruthful. (p. 45-50)


Click here for a copy of the report: “The Department of Justice’s Operation Fast and Furious: Accounts of ATF Agents.”

Justice Dept. untruthful about Fast & Furious, ATF agents tell Congress - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com

Justice Dept. untruthful about Fast & Furious, ATF agents tell Congress - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com

Highlights of the report include:

  • The supervisor of Operation Fast and Furious was “jovial, if not, not giddy but just delighted about” walked guns showing up at crime scenes in Mexico according to an ATF agent.
  • Another ATF agent told the committee about a prediction he made a year ago that “someone was going to die” and that the gun-walking operation would be the subject of a Congressional investigation.
  • The shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords created a “state of panic” within the group conducting the operation as they initially feared a “walked” gun might have been used.
  • One Operation Fast and Furious Agent: “I cannot see anyone who has one iota of concern for human life being okay with this …”
  • An ATF agent predicted to committee investigators that more deaths will occur as a result of Operation Fast and Furious.
  • Multiple agents told the committee that continued assertions by Department of Justice Officials that guns were not knowingly “walked” and that DOJ tried to stop their transport to Mexico are clearly untruthful.

House Panel Continues Look into "Fast and Furious" | C-SPAN

House Panel Continues Look into "Fast and Furious" | C-SPAN

Chair of the Committee, Darrell Issa (R-CA), said the administration ignored committee requests for documents of “Operation Fast and Furious” under “Project Gunrunner.” Issa issued a subpoena on March 31, 2011 to the acting Director of the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATFE) Agency Kenneth Melson.

At Monday’s hearing, the committee examined whether the administration needs to respond to the subpoena. Issa said the Department of Justice is refusing to provide the committee with information; he threatened a “slew” of subpoenas.

The program allowed gun stores near the Mexican border to sell semiautomatic weapons in bulk to Mexican dealers as a way to track Mexican drug cartels. Many of the guns were linked to crimes, including the killing of a Border Patrol agent.

According to Issa, today’s hearing will examine the “reckless decisions” and “tragic outcome” of “Fast and Furious.” The committee is calling a new set of witnesses, including border security and ATFE agents and Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich.

Just a another piece of Obama Government Corruption under this dictatorship.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Evidence Broadens Obama Natural Born Conspiracy - Conservative Crusader

Evidence Broadens Obama Natural Born Conspiracy - Conservative Crusader
Evidence that we have a fraud and a usurper currently residing in the people’s White House is overwhelming, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. But now new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought....
Need details? Read the article.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Articles: Obama's Undeclared War on America

Articles: Obama's Undeclared War on America

Whatever Obama's disposition of the War Powers Act concerning Libya, it is still trivial stuff compared with Obama's undeclared War on America. Boehner and Lugar need to stand down from the snipe hunt over Libya and pay attention to Obama's destruction here at home.

Obama's undeclared War on America has been as intense, unrelenting, costly, and devastating as any undeclared war since Korea. Obama's carpet-bombing through taxes, regulations, energy policies, and pledging to do more of the same has paralyzed and bankrupted the nation, plunging it into a despondency not seen since eight decades ago.

I agree!

Evidence Broadens Obama Natural Born Conspiracy - Conservative Crusader

Evidence Broadens Obama Natural Born Conspiracy - Conservative Crusader

Only the People Can End this Crisis

From 2003 through 2008, member of congress worked to eliminate Article II – Section I – Clause V of the U.S. Constitution, requiring that all presidential candidates be natural born citizens of the United States.

In 2008, fifty state Secretaries allowed the name Barrack Hussein Obama to appear on their state ballot for the president, despite the known fact that Barrack Hussein Obama did not meet the constitutional conditions for the office sought, and that the Democrat Party had intentionally failed to certify Barrack Obama as constitutionally eligible for office.

On January 20, 2009, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Roberts administered the presidential oath of office to an individual and every member of the Supreme Court had knowledge that Barrack Hussein Obama failed to meet constitutional requirements for the office he was about to take.

The Chief Law enforcement officer in our country is head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder. A long-time leftist comrade of Barrack Obama who uses the power of the office to silence the vice of American dissenters, while protecting all who intend America harm.

The voting fraud is so prevalent in America today that it is almost impossible to rely upon the election system as a means of correcting anything and even if you could rely on the system, decent honest qualified leaders do not run for political office in this cesspool we call a country today.

Only 25% of the nation strongly supports this White House resident, which means 75% have great doubts, with more than 35% strongly opposed.

Only the people can put this nation back on track to freedom and liberty, the rule of law and our beloved constitutional republic and they cannot do it in the election booth.

The people must rise up, stand together and hold these criminal actors accountable for the theft of our government which has become the greatest threat to the American way of life in history.

Book Review - Reckless Endangerment by Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner - NYTimes.com

Book Review - Reckless Endangerment by Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner - NYTimes.com
The authors are at their best demonstrating how the revolving door between Wall Street and Washington facilitated the charade. As Treasury secretary, Robert Rubin, formerly the head of Goldman Sachs, pushed for repeal of the ­Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act that had separated commercial from investment banking — a move that Sanford Weill, the chief executive of Travelers Group had long sought so that Travelers could merge with ­Citibank. After leaving the Treasury, Rubin became Citigroup’s vice chairman, and “over the following decade pocketed more than $100,000,000 as the bank sank deeper and deeper into a risky morass of its own design.” With Rubin’s protégé Timothy F. Geithner as its head, the New York Federal Reserve Bank reduced its oversight of Wall Street.
Just an excerpt of a must read article.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

EconomicPolicyJournal.com: Eliminate Bernie Madoff Style Accounting and the R...

EconomicPolicyJournal.com: Eliminate Bernie Madoff Style Accounting and the R...: "When the U.S. government reports its debt, it does not include payment that it is required to make to seniors, veterans and retired employ..."

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Bombshell: Did Obama Change his Name?

Stephen Pidgeon

YouTube - West: "We are fighting in a new 21st Century Battlefield"/ part 1

YouTube - West: "We are fighting in a new 21st Century Battlefield"/ part 1



motion for clarification sent today

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603

E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §

Plaintiff, § Freedom of information violation

§ 5USC §552

v. § CASE # 1:11-cv-00402

§ Assigned to Chief Judge

Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the §

Social Security Administration, § Hon. Royce C. Lamberth

§ Designation: FOIA/Privacy Act

§

§ Motion for Clarification

§

Respondent §

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, hereinafter “Taitz” is submitting this motion for Clarification to be decided based on the memorandum of points and authorities attached herein and oral argument, if the court finds, that the oral argument is required.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Defendant filed Motion to strike, requesting to seal the complaint, first amended complaint and all the exhibits or alternatively redact social security numbers.

Plaintiff thanks the court for allowing the documents not to be sealed, and only requesting refilling with redaction. Plaintiff believes that this case is of the outmost National importance and sealing the complaint and the exhibits will deprive the public of their right to know the truth.

Plaintiff, however, is requesting clarification from the court and the defense, as to what do they want redacted, if anything. Clarification is needed for following reasons:

1. There is a requirement of redaction of VALID social security numbers. Individuals should have only one social security number.

2. Affidavit of investigator Sankey, attached as an exhibit to the complaint, shows that national databases, such as Lexis Nexis and Choice Point, showed over a hundred bogus units of bogus social security numbers and addresses, which included some 39 different social security numbers, none of which were issued in HI, where Obama resided, when he started using a social security number. As one individual is supposed to have only one social security number, and there are N numbers in the databases, it means that at least (N-1 ) numbers are not valid and do not need to be redacted or all N numbers are invalid and do not need to be redacted. There was high probability, that all 39 numbers are invalid, as none were issued in HI. Affidavits of investigator Susan Daniels and recently retired senior deportation officer of the Department of Homeland Security, John Sampson, confirm, that Obama could not possibly obtain Connecticut social security number, while residing in HI. (Exhibits to first amended complaint)

3. Searching through those numbers Taitz found that Connecticut number 042-68-4425, is most commonly used.

4. Obama’s selective service certificate shows him using this number.( Exhibit 1)

5. Social Security Verification systems (Exhibit 2) shows, however, that this number 042-68-4425 was never issued to Obama. This means that none of the numbers used by Obama during his life and used today in the White House, are valid numbers . Those are either numbers, that were never assigned or numbers, that were assigned to deceased individuals, whose death was not reported to the Social Security administration. Mr. Obama’s lifelong friend, domestic terrorist William Ayers, aka Mr. “Guilty as sin, free as a bird”, described in his memoirs, Fugitive Days, how he and his wife, Ms. domestic terrorist Bernadette Dohrn, searched through the cemeteries for graves of children, got their birth certificates and applied for the social security numbers under the names of the deceased. “After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois and North Dakota, searching for those sad little markers of people born between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but they had never applied for a Social Security card.

Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.” Bill Ayers, Fugitive Days. Ayers had a whole business of forged social security card making. It is unfortunate, that the person, occupying the position of the U.S. president, was using and is using a bogus social security number.

Clearly Mr. Obama cannot suffer any losses, due to his use of an invalid number, however there is a great benefit to the public at large, to ascertain the loopholes and malfunction within the Social Security Administration and make sure, that not only Mr. Obama is ultimately prosecuted, but also to make sure, that proper measures are taken to prevent such occurrence in the future. Great public interest and great significance of this most important matter of the national security outweigh minor inconveniences for the defendant commissioner of the Social Security administration and for Mr. Obama.

6. Since NONE of the numbers used by Mr. Obama represent a valid social security number, assigned to him, Taitz needs clarification from the court and the defendant, commissioner of the Social Security Administration, what exactly do they want her to redact? Do they want her to redact numerical gibberish, numbers that are invalid and were never assigned or the numbers, that were stolen from the deceased individuals? Please advise.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

ph 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

orly.taitz@gmail.com

Monday, June 6, 2011

Letter to the new White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

Letter to the new White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

Letter to the new White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler

Posted on | June 5, 2011 | 3 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

ph 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

orly.taitz@gmail.com

Ms. Kathy Ruemmler

White House Counsel

1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC

RE: Taitz v Astrue

11-cv-402 USDC DC Chief Judge Royce Lamberth presiding

06.03.2011

Via certified mail, return receipt requested

Open letter

REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF THE LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF MR. BARACK OBAMA, WHICH WAS DELIVERED TO THE WHITE HOUSE ON 04.27.2011 BY MS. JUDITH CORLEY OF PERKINS COIE, PERSONAL ATTORNEY FOR MR. OBAMA

Dear Ms. Ruemmler,

I hate to burden you with the request for production of documents on the very first day of your tenure as the White House counsel, however the matter is of the outmost importance and urgency for the US National security and the rule of law and U.S. Constitution.

1. I am writing in regards to my legal action Taitz v Astrue. This is a FOIA legal action filed against the commissioner of the social Security administration Michael Astrue with demand to produce an original application for the CT social security number 042-68-4425.

2. Mr. Obama has been using this SSN since around 1980, and it is listed on his Selective service certificate (Exhibit1)

3. attached Social Security Verification Certificate(Exhibit 2 ) shows that this number was never assigned to Mr. Obama. Consequently, we have an individual occupying the White House, the position of the President and Commander in Chief, while using a social security number, which was never assigned to him, from a state, where he never resided.

3. Please, see the attached complaint, (Exhibit 3), which provides sworn affidavits of 3 licensed investigators, including recently retired deportation officer of the Department of Homeland Security, who unanimously conclude, that Mr. Obama could not get this number through legal means.

4. Two days ago, on June 1st, the presiding judge, Chief judge of the US district Court for the District of Columbia Royce Lamberth issued a scheduling order and gave the defense 30 days to file any dispositive motions, that they expect to file.

5. On June 2, 2011, the next day after the order was issued, Robert Bauer, the White House counsel, resigned and you became the new White House Counsel. As you are left “holding the bag”, or more appropriately holding President’s vital records, you ended up becoming the “go to ‘ person for the following request.

6. On April 27, 2011 Ms. Judith Corley of Perkins Coie, the personal attorney for Mr. Obama, supposedly hand delivered to the White House a true and correct copy of the 1961 type written long form birth certificate for Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama revealed this document with great fanfare, calling all the doubters “carnival barkers” and posting the document of the WhiteHouse.gov web page.

7. Unfortunately, the joke was on Mr. Obama, as Mr. Obama became the actual carnival barker, as expert after expert provided analysis, showing undeniable proof, that the image posted on WhiteHouse.gov is not a true and correct copy of the 1961 typewritten document, but a forgery. The consensus it, that it is not even a good forgery, but a cheap, third rate forgery. (Exhibit 4). This issue is integrally connected to my legal action, as individuals with a valid birth certificate do not need to resort to using someone else’s social security number or an invalid social security number. Individuals possessing a forged birth certificate, have to resort to using an invalid social security number or a number assigned to an individual, who might be deceased, but whose death was not reported to the Social Security administration. As such, I respectfully request an appointment for me and my forensic document expert to examine the document in question.

8. The issue of privacy cannot be used as a justification for refusal to grant such examination, as Mr. Obama posted the document for public review. There should not be any conflicting or different information in the original.

9. I wanted to remind you, that as a White House counsel, you do not represent Mr. Obama as an individual, but rather the institution of the US presidency and the position of the Commander in Chief from fraud and from usurpation by one, who is engaged in uttering of forged documents. The White House is the people’s house. It belongs to me, to you and to every one of us, “The People of the United States of America”. You are now the keeper of this house and just as you did a stellar job in protecting “We the people of the United states” against massive fraud committed by powerful and wealthy executives of Enron, you have an obligation and a duty to protect us, the people, and our most sacret institution from this massive fraud committed by a very wealthy and powerful man, who is now usurping the people’s house, while using a forged birth certificate and an invalid Social Security number. We, the people, hope that you will be true to your oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

As such I am trying to schedule an appointment to examine the certified copy of the long form birth certificate, posted on the web site of the WhiteHouse.gov. I will be happy to accommodate your schedule. My forensic document expert and I will be White House at any time convenient for you.

Sincerely,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

cc Congressman Darrell Issa

Chairman House Oversight Committee

2347 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC, 20515

cc Congressman Mike Rogers

Chairman House intelligence Committee

133 Canon house office building

Washington DC 20515

cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher

House subcommittee on Oversight and investigations

House committee on Foreign affairs

2300 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC 20515

Let the Truth Be Known!

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Kagan Assigned DOJ Lawyer Who Argued Obamacare Cases In Appeals Courts | CNSnews.com

Kagan Assigned DOJ Lawyer Who Argued Obamacare Cases In Appeals Courts | CNSnews.com

The law states that any “justice, judge or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might be reasonably questioned.”

It also states that any justice, judge or magistrate “shall also disqualify himself … [w]here he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceedings or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy.”

If Kagan, as a Supreme Court justice, sits in judgment in the health-care cases now being argued by the former deputy she assigned to handle these cases, and that he started handling while she was still his boss, might her “impartiality” be “reasonably questioned?”...

On the morning of Friday, Jan. 8, 2010, Brian Hauck, senior counsel to Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli, sent Katyal an email. “Hi Neal,” Hauck wrote. “Tom wants me to put together a group to get thinking about how to defend against the inevitable challenges to the health care proposals that are pending, and hoped that OSG [Office of Solicitor General] could participate. Could you figure out the right person or people for that? More the merrier. He is hoping to meet next week if we can.”

Katyal had apparently already made up his mind about where he stood on the constitutionality of the not-yet-enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. He instantly fired an email back to Hauck. “Absolutely right on. Let’s crush them,” he said.

Immediately after that, Katyal forwarded Hauck’s email to his boss, Solicitor General Kagan. In that email he indicated he would like Kagan to assign him to handle the expected health-care litigation.

“I am happy to do this if you are ok with it,” he told Kagan. “Otherwise [Deputy Solicitor General] Ed [Kneedler] would be the natural person. Or both of us.”

It did not take Kagan long to decide who she wanted to handle the health-care litigation. She granted Neal “Let’s Crush Them” Katyal his wish. Less than two and a half minutes after she got his email, she sent Katyal a response. “You should do it,” she said.

The remaking of The Supreme Court to the Obama Supremacist Court!