In 1961, if a 17-year-old American female gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not a U.S. citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the "natural born" citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. In 1961, the year of Obama's birth, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to her son.If at birth, Obama was ineligible for American citizenship of any kind, he cannot be "natural-born." If a person is not at the time of his birth an American citizen, he cannot be a natural-born citizen and is ineligible for the Presidency.
LTC Lakin and other patriotic military officers should not face punishment or retribution for adhering to their oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution and for seeking the truth about the President's Constitutional eligibility.
Monday, April 19, 2010
How the Media Lied about Obama’s Birth Records
How the Media Lied about Obama’s Birth Records
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You said: "In 1961, if a 17-year-old American female gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not a U.S. citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the "natural born" citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. "
ReplyDeleteTotal baloney. All persons born in the United States are citizens regardless of the citizenship of their parents. And they are also Natural Born Citizens because Natural Born means "born in the country with the exception of the children of foreign diplomats."
That is why Obama's election was confirmed UNANIMOUSLY by the Congress, and that is why he was sworn in by the Chief Justice of the United States.
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said:
“Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)
Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)
Hey Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteIf you have a legal document showing he was even born in the U.S., please submit. No one else seems to have one.
Obama has posted the official birth certificate of Hawaii. The Certification of Live Birth is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it is the only one that Hawaii sends out. It no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html).
ReplyDeleteObama has posted that and shown the physical copies to both FactCheck and Politifact, and the two top officials of the Department of Health of Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that the facts on the Certification are confirmed by the original birth certificate in the files.
Re: "I believe they are considered citizens, not natural born citizens."
ReplyDeleteAll citizens born in the USA, regardless of the number of parents who are citizens, are Natural Born Citizens. That is why the two Senators said what they did, and it is why there are decisions in Federal lawsuits that call the US-born children of one or two foreign citizens Natural Born Citizens. For example:
Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):
Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.
Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):
Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.
Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974) (child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):
The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States
So you believe they are meet qualifications to be PRESIDENT?
ReplyDeleteYou have lost all credibility.
Do you even have any evidence Obama was born in U.S.?
Prove it or concede. I thought so.
Re: Evidence that Obama was born in the USA. Yes, he has shown the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it was confirmed twice by the officials in Hawaii.
ReplyDeleteRe the qualifications to be president. Other than being 35 years old, a resident of the USA and a Natural Born Citizen (which means not a naturalized citizen), the qualifications are set by the voters. We do no have to vote for a candidate that has one or two foreign parents, but on the other hand we can. The US-born child of two foreign parents may become a good president, or not--it is up to the voters to decide.
There is nothing exotic about "Natural Born Citizen." It simply means a US citizen at birth, one who has not been naturalized. The original meaning of Natural Born, which comes from the Common Law and not from Vattel, was simply "born in the country with the exception of the children of foreign diplomats.' That is why so many federal cases state that the US-born children of one or two foreigners are Natural Born Citizens.
No court claims to have seen "The Official Birth Certificate." They have not been specific what they did see. Generalities may be good enough for you, but with all the destruction he's doing, it isn't enough for me.
ReplyDeleteWere any officials under oath, or just Obama puppets like you? Didn't think so.
Your definition of Natural Born Citizen with respect to Presidential qualificatons is not the accepted definition except to Obama hacks.
Someday your fantasy will be exposed.
The sooner the better!
Re: No court claims to have seen.
ReplyDeleteNo court has seen Bush's birth certificate or Clinton's or Reagan's or JFK's.
No court has asked to see it, and in most of the cases I read, the plaintiffs do not even ask that the court order Obama to show his birth certificate. If they did, Obama could show the Certification of Live Birth, which is the official birth certificate of Hawaii.
The two officials who stated that Obama was born in Hawaii were members of a Republican governor's administration. That makes three of them, the two top officials and the clerk.
Re Definition of Natural Born Citizen. I am glad you asked.
Here is one: “Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.
Here are two more:
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said:
“Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)
Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)
Here are some Federal law cases in which the judge declared that the US-born children of one or two foreigners are Natural Born Citizens.
Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):
Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.
Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):
Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.
Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974) (child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):
The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.
Here is what the Wall Street Journal said:
"Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning."
Which of your two Biafra citizens became President, Obama?
ReplyDeleteDidn't think you had any legal data to prove eligibility. If you did big O wouldn't have to pay $2 mil to prevent it from getting to courts. Granted he has major control over the courts too. Just wait, some day he will be exposed for what he really is, if he isn't already.
It is obvious you don't consider the literal Constitution a binding document.
Pick a name that support your side and that's good enough for you. Not for me. A moderate Republican may be worse than a moderate Democrat. Remember Specter?
Thanks for posting your Liberal spin, but the real truth will prevail, someday.
When it does, Obama will be legally removed and everything he has signed will be overturned, and we can continue the America founded on the original Constitutional Law. And America will continue to be the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.
And if we're lucky, some good will come of this period in history where America didn't have A President. Liberals, like you, Obama, Pelosi, and Reid will be exposed for what you really are--anti-American and anti-Constitution.
How do Libs know so much that isn't so?
You said: "f you did big O wouldn't have to pay $2 mil to prevent it from getting to courts. "
ReplyDeleteHe hasn't. There was never a lawsuit against Obama to get the birth certificate. Most cases do not even ask the court to order that it be shown to the court. The vast majority of cases were to stop the election. Then there were cases to stop the Electoral College from voting, the Congress from certifying the election (which it did, unanimously), and to stop the Inauguration.
As for what you call "Biafra citizens." If you are referring to the US-born children of Biafra citizens, they have not run for president, yet. If they do, they may not be successful for many reasons. However, since the Federal Courts and the legal dictionaries all agree that they are Natural Born Citizens, they are eligible.