"Judicial tax-writing is particularly troubling."
The title link provides the 'Un'Constitutional view of the 'Un'Affordable Care Act that is ignored by Obama drones.This controversial edict has created Several Real Questions:
1. Is The Constitution still the controlling law of the land?
2. Is Judicial Interpretation the controlling law of the land?
3. Is Corruption the controlling law of the land?
We know that 4 Justices that voted with Roberts think they are above the Constitution, or that the Constitution is outdated. This includes 2 Justices that Obama appointed, and 2 that should have recused themselves on this ruling because of pre appointment involvement in the cases.
From my viewpoint, Item #3 Corruption is the controlling law of the land supporting the Obama Regime.
Supporting View PDF:
Landmark Files Amicus Brief Supporting Virginia's Obamacare Summary Judgement Motion.
If one justice, or more, is corrupt, would it still be the law of the land?
No comments:
Post a Comment