Authorities find dozens of fake IDs, uniforms after arresting mystery man | Fox News
Don't you think it is ironic that the authorities are concerned that Roy Antigua has fake IDs, but the Authorities aren't concerned that Obama has fake IDs (Birth Certificate, Social Security Number, and Selective Service Number for starters). Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona confirmed Obama's are fake.
Which one is a bigger threat to America with fake IDs?
Frankly, I don't see what's the Big Deal if Obama can have fake IDs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/17/obama-birth-record-definitely-fraudulent-sheriff-joe-arpaio-says/
ReplyDeleteObama has shown both the images of his birth certificates and the actual physical copies to the press.
ReplyDeleteHe has shown both the short form and the long form birth certificates, and the officials in Hawaii of both parties have repeatedly confirmed the facts on them.
The latest confirmation was accepted as proof of birth in Hawaii buy the conservative secretary of state of Arizona, who ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in November.
In addition to the confirmation by the officials, the fact that Obama has a birth certificate from Hawaii is further confirmed by the Index Data and by the birth notices that were sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii (to a section of the papers called "Health Bureau Statistics) by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. In 1961 the DOH could only issue birth certificates to children born in Hawaii, and it only sent out birth notices to the papers about children that it had issued birth certificates to.
Oh, and Obama's Kenyan grandmother never said that he was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was born in Hawaii, and she said in another interview that the first that her family had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter from Hawaii.
It has been THREE WEEKS since the Sheriff’s press conference, and nothing has happened. NOTHING. Nothing at all.
No member of Congress (and there are 535 of them) has called for an investigation. Not even Rush Limbaugh wants to discuss it.
John McCain, who is one of the Senators of Arizona as well as being the former Republican candidate for president, has recently called the Sheriff crazy. The CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona, who did his own investigation into Obama’s place of birth, has accepted Hawaii’s confirmation that Obama was born there, and he has not changed his mind following Sheriff Joe’s press conference.
Could the explanation be that the whole world is part of the plot? Or, more likely, is it that they believe the birth certificate, and the officials in Hawaii, and the Index Data, and the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the newspapers——and they do not believe the sheriff.
They have good reason to NOT believe the sheriff:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org …
Paragraph by paragraph Response to help educate you:
ReplyDeleteObama/Soetoro has paid several million $ to keep his records from the courts and the only thing The State Run Media has seen is forged documents.
The Hawaii officials are covering their own backside at the same time they are kissing Obamas.
Glad to know that newspapers are the authority. I believe you will find it was common practice to publish incorrect birth info for papers in Hawaii. When did you start accepting newspapers as legal papers?
Your Grandmother link is not provided, but that doesn't surprise me.
It's been 3 years knowing Obama-Soetoro is illegal and nothing has happened. Ever hear of Fast and Furious Cover Up by Racist Holder. He is Secretary of the Injustice Department, appointed by Obama-Soetoro. No one claims he is non partisan.
First of all Rush Limbaugh isn't a member of Congress. The fact that members of Congress haven't investigated means they must be complicit in the coverup and afraid of the truth.
John McCain lost his credibility a long time ago. He may have finally realized he was the one that should have challenged Obama-Soetoto and didn't.
It could be the courts which have reviewed the case are corrupt too and for those of you that don't really care are just plain ignorant, but some may call it treason.
Just the facts which you don't have, just the facts.
When the American People have made such a colossal mistake with Obama-Soetoro, few of you have the courage to admit it.
Unfortunately, it will be your downfall as much as mine for not removing an anti-american with this much power in America.
You have my sympathy, but not my respect.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/blogs/message.aspx/3074#.UCmpI0TyCx8
ReplyDeleteRe: "Obama/Soetoro has paid several million $ to keep his records from the courts and the only thing The State Run Media has seen is forged documents."
ReplyDeleteAnswer: What dream did you get that from? The figures were all made up by birther sites, and since there was never a single case brought against Obama for documents or for his birth certificate, he did not spend a cent. (Every case was to get him off of ballots, so he spent money on staying on ballots, not on hiding things.)
Re: "The Hawaii officials are covering their own backside at the same time they are kissing Obamas."
The Hawaii officials were from BOTH political parties, and their latest confirmation was accepted as evidence by the conservative secretary of state of Arizona, who ruled that that was indeed proof of Obama being born in Hawaii, and that hence Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November. The first of the confirmations was done by Republican officials BEFORE the presidential election in 2008. The would have little motive to lie about Obama being born in Hawaii before a presidential election. If they had said that there was no evidence that he was born in Hawaii, McCain, whom the Republican governor of Hawaii supported, would have won.
Re: "Glad to know that newspapers are the authority. I believe you will find it was common practice to publish incorrect birth info for papers in Hawaii. When did you start accepting newspapers as legal papers?"
The newspapers are confirming evidence that backs up the birth certificate, the confirmation of the officials, the Index Data and the statement by the witness who wrote home about "Stanley had a baby" (to her father, also named Stanley).
Despite what the Sheriff said, in 1961 only the DOH of Hawaii could sent notices to the papers for the section of the papers called "Health Bureau Statistics"---which is where Obama's birth notice appeared. ONLY the DOH could send those notices, and the DOH only sent them for births in Hawaii (and in 1961 Hawaii had a Republican governor).
Re: "Your Grandmother link is not provided, but that doesn't surprise me."
ReplyDeleteHartford Courant newspaper said:
“Six months after they wed, another letter arrived in Kenya, announcing the birth of Barack Hussein Obama, born Aug. 4, 1961. Despite her husband’s continued anger, Sarah Obama said in a recent interview, she “was so happy to have a grandchild in the U.S.”
http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/world/chi-0703270151mar27-
The above is the link. Are you saying that they are lying.
I can also provide a link to the complete text of the tape recorded telephone interview with Obama's Kenyan grandmother in which she said repeatedly that Obama was born IN HAWAII, and birther sites simply cut off the tape and the text just before she was asked "whereabouts was he born.'
Here is the latest of the confirmations from Hawaii, the one that was accepted by the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona as proof that Obama was born in Hawaii:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/23/hawaii-verifies-obama-birth-records-to-arizona-2129696754/
Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii in 2009:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-obama-hawaii_N.htm
Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed twice.
And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital. I think the statement was made in 2010:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html
And here is the statement of a witness who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961. I think the statement was made in 2008:
http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article137495.ece
Here are the birth notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabirth.php
I can also show that the newspapers in Hawaii did not accept birth notices for the Health Bureau Statistics section from any source other than the Hawaii government in 1961, and the Hawaii government did not issue birth certificates to people born outside of Hawaii in 1961, and the Hawaii government only sent out birth notices to the papers for children who had received Hawaii birth certificates, and the government of Hawaii checked claims of birth at home, demanding a witness statement.
In addition, there is the Index Data:
http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04/in_hawaii_its_easy_to_get_birt.html
and
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/23/president-obamas-birth-records-made-public-for-years/
Re: "First of all Rush Limbaugh isn't a member of Congress. The fact that members of Congress haven't investigated means they must be complicit in the coverup and afraid of the truth."
ReplyDeleteRush is not a member of Congress. Who said that he was? He is, however, a strong conservative commentator, and if he really thought that Obama's birth certificate were forged, he would comment about it. Neither he nor Ann Coulter have done so, and the National Review has published articles mocking birthers and Sheriff Joe in particular.
Re Congress not doing anything. The fact that they haven't launched an investigation does not mean that "means they must be complicit in the coverup." It means that they believe the Hawaii birth certificate, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii, and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers sent to the papers by the DOH in 1961---and they do NOT believe the birther claims.
Maybe you would like some legal documents instead of newspaper clippings and the media spin:
ReplyDeleteTranscript Farrar: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Transcript-Farrar1.pdf
Transcript and affidavit Sheriff Arpaio: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Transcript-and-affidavit-Sheriff-Arpaio1.pdf
affidavit Chito Papa Birth Certificate: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/affidavit-Chito-Papa-Birth-Certificate.docx
Affidavit Chito Papa Obama's CT SSN: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Affidavit-Chito-Papa-Obamas-CT-SSN.pdf
Affidavit Linda Jordan Obama's SSN: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Affidavit-Linda-Jordan-Obamas-SSN.pdf
Affidavit-Tim-Adams: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Affidavit-Tim-Adams.pdf
Affidavit of John Sampson 03.08.2010: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Affidavit-of-John-Sampson-03.08.2010.pdf
Affidavit Susan Daniels final: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Affidavit-Susan-Daniels-final.pdf
Affidavit of Chris Strunk: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Affidavit-of-Chris-Strunk.pdf
Thanks for your interest and welcome on board to expose the Fraud Obama-Soetoro.
The only documents Obama-Soetoro has released regarding his birth were forged.
ReplyDeleteHis Social Security Number belongs to a dead person from CT.
His Selective Service Document is not verifiable with Selective Service.
Here is some more information you might be interested in if you are not part of the Obama-Soetoro coverup:
1. DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
Video of Trial in GA.
2. Dreams from My Real Father
3. 2016 Obama's America
These might give you concern about who Obama-Soetoro-Davis really is. But Obots don't want to find the truth and ignore the fraud. They just want the "truth" to be what they claim it is.
You won't have any real proof to prove Obama-Soetoro-Davis isn't a FRAUD--because HE is a Fraud!
When there is no case an affidavit is not proof of anything. People can, and do, lie in them because they have no fear whatsoever that they will be prosecuted. That is why Tim Adams, a member of a white supremacist group can allege in an affidavit that he was told that there was no birth certificate for Obama. But it is a lie.
ReplyDeleteWe know that it is a lie because he said that he was told by other members of the Electoral Commission, but no other member or former member of the commission has confirmed what Adams said. And the officials in Hawaii have stated that none of the members of the Electoral Commission actually had access to birth certificate files, so what Adams said was simply made up.
And we know that the officials in Hawaii have repeatedly stated that there is a birth certificate file for Obama and that the birth certificate that Obama showed is accurate, and that the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona accepted this as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November.
Re Social Security:
The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.
Millions of people have multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have
http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html
You might well ask why, if there is evidence that Obama has multiple SS numbers and that one of them came from Connecticut that NO committee in Congress wants to investigate? Why not?
Because it is not illegal to have mistakes in your SS files, and lots of people do. And there is no evidence that this is other than a mistake, or a lot of mistakes. Republicans would be GLAD to hold a hearing to show that there was a crime involved with Obama's SS number. But they KNOW that there is no evidence.
BTW, has any birther site shown you this?
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiolani-confirms/
Re: "media spin."
ReplyDeleteThis is what the CONSERVATIVE National Review had to say about Sheriff Joe:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors
Good to know that Obamaconsipiracy link from above was authored by Dr. Conspiracy. Any more articles to show your incompetence?
ReplyDeleteRegarding affidavits, they were presented in a real court case in GA,and the video is a video of the same court case.
ReplyDeleteKeep diggin and denying.
It will cost both of us in the end, but I'll have the satisfaction of being right and you'll have the regret in addition to the pain.
The "real court in GA" ruled AGAINST the birthers.
ReplyDeleteRe: "http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiolani-confirms/---which you claim was written by Dr Conspiracy.
If you look closely, there is a button with which you can play the radio show. Dr Conspiracy did not make it up.
Nor did he or anyone make up Obama's Hawaii birth certificate, which the officials of BOTH political parties in Hawaii, the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii all show.
Good thing there is a recording. You have to know Dr. Conspiracy, Media Matters, and others can't make this stuff up.
ReplyDeleteIf this is what you call reliable sources, I'd hate to see your other sources.
God Bless America!
They did not make the stuff up. They did not make the recording up or the fact that it took place.
DeleteThey did not make up the fact that Obama has shown his birth certificate or the fact that the officials in Hawaii of both parties have repeatedly confirmed the facts on it. They did not make up the fact that the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona accepted the latest confirmation from Hawaii and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot. They did not make up the Index Data or the birth notices that were sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. These are all reliable sources, and I can show the citations for them.