Part #5 of ObamaCON Series by a True Patriot with a code name of "Hit It." I did not write any of this series.
Welcome to the United Banana Republic of Radical Islam
• ARMY – CONTROLLING THE INEVITABLE STAMPEDEObama’s National Defense Force is a critical element needed to ensure that any revolt by We- the-People can be suppressed. Even without a national emergency, it could be used to establish similar total control to suppress dissent. However, the legal mechanism is already in place for controlling a national uprising by means of “martial law” or its equivalent:
• SENATE CONCERN OVER MARTIAL LAW…………….SEPTEMBER 30, 1973
EXCERPT: Joint Statement, Sens. Frank Church (D-ID) and Charles McMathias (R-MD)
http://www.oilempire.us/redalert.html
The President has the power to seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, call reserve forces amounting to 2 1/2 million men to duty, institute martial law, seize and control all means of transportation, regulate all private enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all Americans...
Most [of these laws] remain as a potential source of virtually unlimited power for a President should he choose to activate them. It is possible that some future President could exercise this vast authority in an attempt to place the United States under authoritarian rule.
While the danger of a dictatorship arising through legal means may seem remote to us today, recent history records Hitler seizing control through the use of the emergency powers provisions contained in the laws of the Weimar Republic.
• CONCERN BY THE DEMOCRATS OVER MARTIAL LAW………..OCTOBER 26, 2006
EXCERPT: Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
http://towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/911/
In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions.
Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder." The law also facilitates militarized police round-ups and detention of protesters, so called "illegal aliens," "potential terrorists" and other "undesirables" for detention in facilities already contracted for and under construction by Halliburton. That's right. Under the cover of a trumped-up "immigration emergency" and the frenzied militarization of the southern border, detention camps are being constructed right under our noses, camps designed for anyone who resists the foreign and domestic agenda of the Bush administration. Make no mistake about it: the de-facto repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) is … the only U.S. criminal statute that outlaws military operations directed against the American people under the cover of 'law enforcement.' As such, it has been the best protection we've had against the power-hungry intentions of an unscrupulous and reckless executive, an executive intent on using force to enforce its will. Unfortunately, this past week, the president dealt posse comitatus, along with American democracy, a near fatal blow. Consequently, it will take an aroused citizenry to undo the damage wrought by this horrendous act, part and parcel, as we have seen, of a long train of abuses and outrages perpetrated by this authoritarian (Bush) administration.
On September 19th, a lone Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) noted that 2007's Defense Authorization Act contained a "widely opposed provision to allow the President more control over the National Guard [adopting] changes to the Insurrection Act, which will make it easier for this or any future President to use the military to restore domestic order WITHOUT the consent of the nation's governors."
• OTHER ONLINE MARTIAL LAW REFERENCES:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_mlaw.html
• THE OBAMACON ARMY:
Obama knows that the U.S. Military will not willingly use their power to suppress the American people. That is why he wants a National Defense Force with (his own words) a size and strength that matches that of our current armed forces. It is no accident that his administration has started using the phrase “domestic terrorists” to describe angry citizens who object to his policies. Also, there is an interesting feature of the Posse Comitatus Act where it names those specific military forces that are prohibited from being used against We-the-People. Since Obama’s new defense force did not exist at the time of that act, it is not “named” within that act. Obama’s new ARMY just might legally fall outside the jurisdiction of the Posse Comitatus Act and could then be used against We-the-People with impunity. Heil Hitler.
No comments:
Post a Comment