Lakin’s Defense.
The unlawfulness of Obama’s command must be a fact!
The onus of establishing this fact—except where the order is palpably illegal upon its face—devolves upon the defense, and clear and convincing evidence will be required to rebut the presumption that Obama is legit! (Winthrop, pgs. 575-576).
No one in Congress is responsible or accountable to defend Colonel Lakin.
To constitute the specific offense of disobedience of orders the “superior officer” must of course be known to be such by the accused, at the time of his giving the order which is not obeyed.
Obama’s background is an open secret. Not a single person wearing the uniform of the U.S. military possesses specific knowledge that Obama lawfully holds office of President as Commander-in-Chief.
At the same time, every U.S. officer is required to know as a matter of duty whether the Commander-in-chief legitimately holds office. This to include Army Lieutenant Colonel Daniel J. Driscoll (Lt.Col. Lakin’s Article 32 hearing officer).
Simply said, no order issued by any officer in the American military establishment is a lawful order since 20 January 2009.
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
The JAG HUNTER
The JAG HUNTER
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment