Sunday, June 24, 2012

The Case for Removing Holder - By Andrew C. McCarthy - The Corner - National Review Online

The Case for Removing Holder - By Andrew C. McCarthy - The Corner - National Review Online
Holder, by contrast, did not assert a legal privilege. He instead made up a frivolous rationale for obstructing Congress’s investigation and relied on it for months — even as he and his subordinates have repeatedly been forced to acknowledge that representations they made to the committee were false. It is one thing to posit a real legal claim that happens to be inapposite under the circumstances. It is quite another for the chief federal law-enforcement official in the country, whose post is created by and reliant on Congress, to stymie Congress based on a fabrication that he passed off as a legal theory.
Andrew McCarthy's analysis you can take to the court, if we still have any legitimate courts left, under this Holder Injustice Department.

No comments:

Post a Comment