Taitz's Alabama case is Different from MS and Ca cases

Very important Press release: Obama’s camp publishes a response to a petition by Attorney Taitz to Judge Moore. Their response confirms that she is on a right track | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Further, the response shows that indeed Alabama case is vastly
different from her MS and Ca cases and there is a great chance of her
prevailing in the US District Court in MS, as well as the 9th Circuit
and of course in specific cases in DC and MD.

The difference between AL and MS cases is as follows:

1.
Plaintiffs in AL sought only a Writ of Mandamus from the court to the
Sec of State to seek certified copies of birth certificates of all the
candidates. They never asked for a declaratory judgment and the court
noted that a lack of such a request was a problem.  In Taitz cases she
did not make such an error and specifically asked for a declaratory
relief

2. In MS she brought additional RICO (Racketeering
Influenced Corrupt organization ) cause of action, which specifically
addresses criminal collusion, which was not brought in any other cases,
including AL

3. Taitz filed MS case before the primary, so there cannot be a claim of laches, she did not file too late

4. Eastern District of CA already upheld the right of the Sec of State to vet candidates

6.
9th Circuit ruled in Keyes that as long as the case was filed before
the candidate took office the court can rule on legitimacy of a
candidate.

Based on what Taitz saw in responses from Obama camp
there is  good probability that Judge Moore will forward Taitz petition
to the Federal and County Grand Jury and the public is requested to
write to Judge Moore and Judge Parker asking them to grant the petition
by Taitz to forward evidence of criminal activity, which was forwarded
to them by Taitz to the Federal and County Grand jury as well as state
and county prosecutors. Also, very limited response by the Obama camp
tells Taitz that she has a high probability of getting positive rulings
by Judge Wingate in MS, by Chief Judge of the 9th Circuit Alex Kozinsky
in Grinols, as well as by Judge Hollander in MD in the case dealing with
Obama’s use of a stolen SSN of Harry Bounel, as well as by Judge
Lamberth on Obama’s use of a fabricated Selective Service certificate
with a fabricated postal stamp affixed to it.

 One key Issue:  9th Circuit ruled in Keyes that as long as the case was filed before
the candidate took office the court can rule on legitimacy of a
candidate.