Wonder who Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, or current Resident in White House really is?Evidence of What?
· Barack Obama is an unconstitutional resident of the people’s White House
· He did not become America’s first unconstitutional president alone, he had help
· While most of the criminal cabal are Democrats, some are Republicans
· Every member of congress knew Obama was ineligible for the office of president
· Every member of the U.S. Supreme Court knows that Obama is unconstitutional
· Every intelligent member of the press knows the truth, but won’t dare tell this story
· Numerous people tried to remove natural born citizen from the constitution
· They all know the correct definition of natural born citizen and applied it to John McCain
· None of these people wants to apply the same definition to Barack Obama
· Nobody in the Federal Government is going to do anything about the greatest constitutional crisis in American history, because all of them are complicit on one level or anotherAs a result, the DNC was forced to remove the “constitutionally eligible” language from the 2008 DNC certification of the Obama-Biden ticket, omitting from the certification the following language –
“and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
Instead, the DNC only certified that the Obama-Biden ticket was duly nominated for the offices of President and Vice President, using the following language –“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:” (Note that the word “through” is misspelled in both DNC versions, indicating that it is an alteration from the same document.)
From his actions you can see he is Anti-American, Christian in name only, and well supported by others that would like to break America too.
Wouldn't it be useful to know background of any individual that uses the title of President of the United States?
If you think you can remove him without addressing this issue, just remember he took the office when the issue was ignored, and now, he controls the Injustice Department and added two accomplices to The Supreme Court.
God Bless America (The one with The Constitution)!
Other information:
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/bookmarks/fact-checking-and-debunking/the-debunkers-guide-to-obama-conspiracy-theories/#nbc
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natural-born-citizenship-for-dummies/
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/02/an-open-letter-to-mario-apuzzo/
http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=21346
And:
“At the time of independence, and at the time of the framing of the Constitution, the term “natural born” with respect to citizenship was in use for many years in the American colonies, and then in the states, from British common law and legal usage. Under the common law principle of jus soli (law of the soil), persons born on English soil, even of two alien parents, were “natural born” subjects and, as noted by the Supreme Court, this “same rule” was applicable in the American colonies and “in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution ...” with respect to citizens. In textual constitutional analysis, it is understood that terms used but not defined in the document must, as explained by the Supreme Court, “be read in light of British common law” since the Constitution is “framed in the language of the English common law.”--- Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement, Jack Maskell, Congressional Research Service, November 2011.
And:
“Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural born-born subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [ ] natural-born citizens.”--- Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 NE2d 678, 688 (2009), (Ind.Supreme Court, Apr. 5, 2010)
“It is well settled that “native-born” citizens, those born in the United States, qualify as natural born.” It is also clear that persons born abroad of alien parents, who later become citizens by naturalization,” do not.” Jill A. Pryor. The Natural-Born Citizen Clause and Presidential Eligibility: An Approach for Resolving Two Hundred Years of Uncertainty – Yale Law Journal 1988
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President...."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
Thanks for regurgitating the Liberal Spin.
ReplyDeleteYou might check previous post: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22606
Read this morning that Obama's "mother" may not have qualified because at that time she was only 18 and you had to have lived in US for 10 years which she did, but I think you had to had to be here 5 years after your 14th birthday. Of course, you don't have any evidence who his mother really is much less his father.
You don't have any credible evidence who he is or where he was born other than his book which was probably written by Bill Ayres.
Have you seen a legitimate birth certificate, a hospital record, any passport, or any legal document to support the claims you make above?
You probably even believe he has a legitimate SS Number, which he doesn't.
If you don't have any facts to show, you are just a fool and have swallowed the Liberal line of deception.
You don't know for sure whose side Obama or Soetoro or whatever his real name is on either. Do you?
Thanks for your comment.
Re: "Read this morning that Obama's "mother" may not have qualified because at that time she was only 18 and you had to have lived in US for 10 years which she did, but I think you had to had to be here 5 years after your 14th birthday. Of course, you don't have any evidence who his mother really is much less his father."
ReplyDeleteThat applies, of course, only to births outside of the USA. All births inside the USA, except for the children of foreign diplomats, result in US Citizens--regardless of the age of the mother.
Re SS Number> Perhaps the birther press did not tell you this, but MILLIONS of people have errors in their SS numbers, and millions more have multiple SS numbers, caused mainly by errors by Social Security Administration clerks over the years.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have
http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html
The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.
Continuing:
DeleteRe the place of birth. No president or presidential candidate has ever shown more proof of his place of birth than Obama. And the proof that he has shown has been confirmed repeatedly.
First, however, notice that none of the REPUBLICAN candidates for president showed their birth certificates, and some of them were said to have been born as little as 50 miles from a foreign country, in contrast to Hawaii--which is thousands of miles away.
Obama showed both the physical copies and images of both his short-form and his long-form birth certificate. The physical copy of the latter was handed around in the White House press room, and everyone there got a chance to hold it, examine it, and feel the seal (on the back where it is supposed to be).
Only BIRTHER "experts"--who have not proven their expertise, and certainly have no claims to objectivity--have claimed that there is something wrong with Obama's birth certificate. No official in Hawaii has ever said that there is anything wrong with either the short-form or the long-form, and in fact THREE Republican (and several Democrat) officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on Obama's birth certificate, that he was born in Hawaii in 1961.
No, his Kenyan grandmother did NOT say that he was born in Kenya. That was made up by birthers too, along with a lot of forged "Kenyan birth certificates" and forged videos.
For those of you who still believe that Obama could have been born somewhere else than in Hawaii, a question for you:
DeleteI’ll bet that you know (but, actually, you may have forgotten) that the US government requires, and has long required, that a child being carried into the USA must have some kind of official travel document to be admitted. This is usually a US passport for the child. Or, it could be the fact that the child is entered on the mother’s US passport. Or, it could be a US visa for the child on a foreign passport. Without one of those, we would not let the child into the country.
So, IF Obama really had been born in Kenya (or in any country other than the USA), he would have had to have one of those documents–wouldn’t he? His family would have had to show the passport, wouldn’t they? To show the passport, they would have had to have applied for the passport or the visa for Obama. And, if Obama really were born in Kenya (or another country), they would have had to have applied for it in the US consulate or embassy there, wouldn’t they?
Such applications are FILED by the US government. The documents exist in multiple files, the actual application itself, communication about it with Washington, entries in the passport file, entries in the application file, entries in the places where the child is carried into the USA. The Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department and the INS for eight years before Obama was elected. Don’t you think that they would have checked the claim that he was born outside the USA?
All they had to do was find one of those files and McCain would win the election.
Well, they never did. There is no such file.
So the question is, do you think that the Bush Administration was part of the plot?
Do you think that the files, the documents, the application for the documents, the communications about the documents were all lost or hidden? Remember, they are in multiple files, the file of the passport holder, the files of applications for passports, the files in the US embassy in foreign countries, the files in the State Department and in the INS (which would have checked in Obama at an entry point if he had actually traveled in 1961)–and yet no document has been found. Why not?
The absence of the travel document, plus the Hawaii birth certificate, plus the confirmation of the facts on it by three Republican (and several Democrat) officials, plus the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, plus the witness who remembers being told of the birth and writing home about it (to her father, named Stanley, about the unusual event of a birth to a woman named Stanley). All this is evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.
What documents do you have as proof that Obama, Soetoro, or What His Name, that is Residing in the White House is anything, or anybody.
ReplyDeleteDo you have his Columbia, Harvard, or any Fairy Land Records?
If I remember, they found Bushes. You might not remember, but both of them served their country.
That's a good one about the SS #. Guess that is why it doesn't show up in the SS database.
The reason that a SS number does not show up the database is, wait for it, they cancelled it. If your SS number were published you would cancel it too. That is because in addition to all the mistakes in the SS numbers there actually are people who use other people's SS numbers--the ones that have been published.
ReplyDeleteBirthers, of course, are too dumb to see this. However, it is the reason--the simple reason--why none of the members of Congress have asked to investigate Obama's SS number, nor has any of the Republican candidates for president, nor has Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or Bill O'Reilly.
Re Harvard, Columbia and Occidental Records. Do you have the college records for ANY of the Republican candidates? Sure, Yale leaked Bush's--but that is not a good thing to do--so Harvard, Columbia, etc have not leaked Obama's, and no university has leaked the grades of ANY of the Republican candidates.
However, Harvard did state that Obama graduated from Harvard Law School Magna Cum Laude.
Re documents.
I'm glad you asked.
Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of the long-form birth certificate that was passed around in the White House Press room, and the statement of the reporter who photographed it and her statement that she had felt the raised seal:
http://lockerz.com/s/96540721
Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of Obama's short form birth certificate, front and back.
http://factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-usa/
Here is confirmation that it is the official and only birth certificate that Hawaii issues
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574320190095246658.html)
Here is the first of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.
http://www.kitv.com/r/17860890/detail.html
Notice where it says that there is an original birth certificate filed. Well, in 1961 foreign birth certificates, even those from other states, could not be filed in Hawaii. So the birth certificate in Obama’s files must be a Hawaii birth certificate.
Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-obama-hawaii_N.htm
Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed twice.
And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html
And here is the statement of a witness who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961:
http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article137495.ece
All these show that Obama was born in Hawaii.
Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabirth.php
These are confirmation of the birth certificates. They are confirmation because they are not ads. Hawaii newspapers did not accept birth notice ads in 1961. They only took their birth notices from the government, which sent them out for all births in Hawaii and NO births outside of Hawaii. Could the government of Hawaii have been fooled by relatives in 1961? NO. Why not? Because whenever there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii insisted on a witness statement.
Re Soetoro:
Yes, Obama used that name while he was in Indonesia. But he never legally changed his name, nor was he adopted by Soetoro, and he never became a citizen of Indonesia--as a simple telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy in Washington will confirm.